2001PubMedRequires access

Comparative effect of theophylline and aminophylline on theophylline blood concentrations and peripheral blood eosinophils in patients with asthma.

Motokazu Kato, Hitomi Tatsuta, Kaoru Okada, K Sakamoto, Hisaki Morita

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The comparative effects of a new theophylline preparation (Theodrip) and aminophylline on blood concentrations of theophylline were examined in 74 patients with asthma. Subjects were intravenously administered 200 mg of Theodrip or 250 mg of aminophylline for 1 h. The mean increases in blood theophylline concentration after Theodrip or aminophylline administration were 8.80 +/- 1.80 mg/l and 8.81 +/- 2.15 mg/l, respectively. In addition, these patients were divided into four groups based on baseline theophylline concentrations before infusion of Theodrip or aminophylline: i) naïve patients (not administered theophylline); ii) those with a baseline theophylline concentration of 0-5 mg/l; iii) those with a baseline theophylline concentration of 5-10 mg/l; iv) those with a baseline theophylline concentration of 10-15 mg/l. Mean increases in blood theophylline concentration after administration of Theodrip in each group were similar to those after aminophylline administration. We found no significant differences between Theodrip and aminophylline. However, when the comparative effects of Theodrip and aminophylline on peripheral blood eosinophil counts were examined, Theodrip, but not aminophylline, reduced blood eosinophil counts. With acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma, it is expected that Theodrip, but not aminophylline, may have an antiinflammatory effect. In conclusion, it is suggested that Theodrip is a more useful drug than aminophylline in patients with acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The comparative effects of a new theophylline preparation (Theodrip) and aminophylline on blood concentrations of theophylline were examined in 74 patients with asthma. Subjects were intravenously administered 200 mg of Theodrip or 250 mg of aminophylline for 1 h. The mean increases in blood theophylline concentration after Theodrip or aminophylline administration were 8.80 +/- 1.80 mg/l and 8.81 +/- 2.15 mg/l, respectively. In addition, these patients were divided into four groups based on baseline theophylline concentrations before infusion of Theodrip or aminophylline: i) naïve patients (not administered theophylline); ii) those with a baseline theophylline concentration of 0-5 mg/l; iii) those with a baseline theophylline concentration of 5-10 mg/l; iv) those with a baseline theophylline concentration of 10-15 mg/l. Mean increases in blood theophylline concentration after administration of Theodrip in each group were similar to those after aminophylline administration. We found no significant differences between Theodrip and aminophylline. However, when the comparative effects of Theodrip and aminophylline on peripheral blood eosinophil counts were examined, Theodrip, but not aminophylline, reduced blood eosinophil counts. With acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma, it is expected that Theodrip, but not aminophylline, may have an antiinflammatory effect. In conclusion, it is suggested that Theodrip is a more useful drug than aminophylline in patients with acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The comparative effects of a new theophylline preparation (Theodrip) and aminophylline on blood concentrations of theophylline were examined in 74 patients with asthma. Subjects were intravenously administered 200 mg of Theodrip or 250 mg of aminophylline for 1 h. The mean increases in blood theophylline concentration after Theodrip or aminophylline administration were 8.80 +/- 1.80 mg/l and 8.81 +/- 2.15 mg/l, respectively. In addition, these patients were divided into four groups based on baseline theophylline concentrations before infusion of Theodrip or aminophylline: i) naïve patients (not administered theophylline); ii) those with a baseline theophylline concentration of 0-5 mg/l; iii) those with a baseline theophylline concentration of 5-10 mg/l; iv) those with a baseline theophylline concentration of 10-15 mg/l. Mean increases in blood theophylline concentration after administration of Theodrip in each group were similar to those after aminophylline administration. We found no significant differences between Theodrip and aminophylline. However, when the comparative effects of Theodrip and aminophylline on peripheral blood eosinophil counts were examined, Theodrip, but not aminophylline, reduced blood eosinophil counts. With acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma, it is expected that Theodrip, but not aminophylline, may have an antiinflammatory effect. In conclusion, it is suggested that Theodrip is a more useful drug than aminophylline in patients with acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma.

Key concepts: Aminophylline, Theophylline, Medicine, Asthma, Eosinophil, Bronchodilator, Anesthesia, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative effect of theophylline and aminophylline on theophylline blood concentrations and peripheral blood eosinophils in patients with asthma. — Research Paper | ScholarLens