IS THE CONSUMPTION–INCOME RATIO STATIONARY? EVIDENCE FROM LINEAR AND NON‐LINEAR PANEL UNIT ROOT TESTS FOR OECD AND NON‐OECD COUNTRIES*
Mario Cerrato, Christian de Peretti, Chris Stewart
Abstract
Mario Cerrato, Christian de Peretti, Chris Stewart
Abstract
This paper applies recently developed heterogeneous non‐linear and linear panel unit root tests that account for cross‐sectional dependence to 24 OECD and 33 non‐OECD countries' consumption–income ratios over the period 1951–2003. We apply a recently developed methodology that facilitates the use of panel tests to identify which individual cross‐sectional units are stationary and which are non‐stationary. We find that the majority (78 per cent) of the series are non‐stationary with slightly fewer non‐OECD countries' (74 per cent) series exhibiting a unit root than OECD countries (83 per cent).
OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper applies recently developed heterogeneous non‐linear and linear panel unit root tests that account for cross‐sectional dependence to 24 OECD and 33 non‐OECD countries' consumption–income ratios over the period 1951–2003. We apply a recently developed methodology that facilitates the use of panel tests to identify which individual cross‐sectional units are stationary and which are non‐stationary. We find that the majority (78 per cent) of the series are non‐stationary with slightly fewer non‐OECD countries' (74 per cent) series exhibiting a unit root than OECD countries (83 per cent).
Key concepts: Unit root, Econometrics, Economics, Consumption (sociology), Unit (ring theory), Series (stratigraphy), Panel data, Unit root test