Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance
Thomas A. Bonfiglio
Abstract
Thomas A. Bonfiglio
Abstract
In this issue of Cancer Cytopathology, the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (which has been a source of controversy since its inclusion in the Bethesda Classification system for cervical cytology in 1989) is revisited. Based on the problems associated with the ASCUS category, some have hoped for its elimination. In the referenced article, the authors evaluated such an approach with regard to its effect on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this issue of Cancer Cytopathology, the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (which has been a source of controversy since its inclusion in the Bethesda Classification system for cervical cytology in 1989) is revisited. Based on the problems associated with the ASCUS category, some have hoped for its elimination. In the referenced article, the authors evaluated such an approach with regard to its effect on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Key concepts: Ascus (bryozoa), Papanicolaou stain, Bethesda system, Medicine, Cytopathology, Papanicolaou Test, Cytology, Premalignant lesion