2011Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online/˜The œjournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the LawRequires access

Jury Instructions in a Case With a Defense of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity

Kristina P. Lloyd, Ira K. Packer

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In State v. Okie , 987 A.2d 495 (Me. 2010), John Okie appealed his conviction for murder, arguing that the court improperly instructed the jury regarding the defense of not criminally responsible by reason of insanity, because the jury was not informed as to the consequences of such a verdict. He

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In State v. Okie , 987 A.2d 495 (Me. 2010), John Okie appealed his conviction for murder, arguing that the court improperly instructed the jury regarding the defense of not criminally responsible by reason of insanity, because the jury was not informed as to the consequences of such a verdict. He

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In State v. Okie , 987 A.2d 495 (Me. 2010), John Okie appealed his conviction for murder, arguing that the court improperly instructed the jury regarding the defense of not criminally responsible by reason of insanity, because the jury was not informed as to the consequences of such a verdict. He

Key concepts: Jury, Verdict, Insanity defense, Conviction, Insanity, Psychology, Law, Diminished responsibility

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Jury Instructions in a Case With a Defense of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity — Research Paper | ScholarLens