1992Canadian Journal of CommunicationRequires access

Feminisms and Balance

Suzanne Monique Strutt

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Feminist perspectives on balance take one of two forms: they are critiques of either “bad balance” or “balance as usual.” While the critique of bad balance has led to some important feminist interventions in the regulatory arena, the feminist critique of balance-as-usual holds that the ideal of balance is itself problematic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Feminist perspectives on balance take one of two forms: they are critiques of either “bad balance” or “balance as usual.” While the critique of bad balance has led to some important feminist interventions in the regulatory arena, the feminist critique of balance-as-usual holds that the ideal of balance is itself problematic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Feminist perspectives on balance take one of two forms: they are critiques of either “bad balance” or “balance as usual.” While the critique of bad balance has led to some important feminist interventions in the regulatory arena, the feminist critique of balance-as-usual holds that the ideal of balance is itself problematic.

Key concepts: Balance (ability), Ideal (ethics), Balance theory, Sociology, Political science, Psychology, Social science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feminisms and Balance — Research Paper | ScholarLens