Strength of high temperature brazed joints:influence of brazing parameters
E. Lugscheider, K. Kloehn, R. Lison
Abstract
E. Lugscheider, K. Kloehn, R. Lison
Abstract
Investigations on strength of brazed joints in AISI Types 321 and 316 Ti stainless steel made with two metallurgically different high temperature filler metals (BAu-4 and BNi-5) demonstrated the influence of important brazing parameters. Using the AWS single-lap standard test method, several parameters-brazing cycle, condition (roughness) of the brazing surface, fixed and free-adjusting clearance - were varied. With the brittle phase, tests with filler metal BNi-5 showed that too short a brazing time and brazing surface conditions hindering filler metal flow give an average unit tensile stress in the base metal at failure which is similar to the 0.2% yield strength of the base metal. The strength of joints brazed with the ductile gold-nickel filler metal BAu-4 is by no means influenced by the roughness of the surface as much as it is by the nickel-base filler metal. Comparing investigations on joints with a fixed and free-adjusting clearance shows that, in the case of the free-adjusting clearance, the average unit tensile stress in the base metal at failure is about 10% lower. Investigations demonstrated that, using applicable brazing parameters even at over-lap-to-thickness ratios of 1.5-2, joints brazed with both filler metals failed in the base metal.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Investigations on strength of brazed joints in AISI Types 321 and 316 Ti stainless steel made with two metallurgically different high temperature filler metals (BAu-4 and BNi-5) demonstrated the influence of important brazing parameters. Using the AWS single-lap standard test method, several parameters-brazing cycle, condition (roughness) of the brazing surface, fixed and free-adjusting clearance - were varied. With the brittle phase, tests with filler metal BNi-5 showed that too short a brazing time and brazing surface conditions hindering filler metal flow give an average unit tensile stress in the base metal at failure which is similar to the 0.2% yield strength of the base metal. The strength of joints brazed with the ductile gold-nickel filler metal BAu-4 is by no means influenced by the roughness of the surface as much as it is by the nickel-base filler metal. Comparing investigations on joints with a fixed and free-adjusting clearance shows that, in the case of the free-adjusting clearance, the average unit tensile stress in the base metal at failure is about 10% lower. Investigations demonstrated that, using applicable brazing parameters even at over-lap-to-thickness ratios of 1.5-2, joints brazed with both filler metals failed in the base metal.
Key concepts: Brazing, Materials science, Filler metal, Base metal, Metallurgy, Ultimate tensile strength, Composite material, Surface roughness