2010SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal: A Transnational Analysis of the Negative Effect of Competence-Competence

Ozlem Susler

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The issue of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal raises questions such as, who decides whether the arbitral tribunal can determine its own jurisdiction and at what stage of the arbitral process should judicial intervention, if any, occur. There are divergent approaches taken by courts to these questions. This article offers a comparative analysis of jurisdictional approaches to providing priority to the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction. This article identifies the French approach as the best practice and it is argued that it provides the optimum balance between providing priority to the parties' agreement to arbitrate and simultaneously ensuring there is access to courts if one of the parties presents a genuine challenge to the jurisdiction of the tribunal.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The issue of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal raises questions such as, who decides whether the arbitral tribunal can determine its own jurisdiction and at what stage of the arbitral process should judicial intervention, if any, occur. There are divergent approaches taken by courts to these questions. This article offers a comparative analysis of jurisdictional approaches to providing priority to the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction. This article identifies the French approach as the best practice and it is argued that it provides the optimum balance between providing priority to the parties' agreement to arbitrate and simultaneously ensuring there is access to courts if one of the parties presents a genuine challenge to the jurisdiction of the tribunal.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The issue of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal raises questions such as, who decides whether the arbitral tribunal can determine its own jurisdiction and at what stage of the arbitral process should judicial intervention, if any, occur. There are divergent approaches taken by courts to these questions. This article offers a comparative analysis of jurisdictional approaches to providing priority to the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction. This article identifies the French approach as the best practice and it is argued that it provides the optimum balance between providing priority to the parties' agreement to arbitrate and simultaneously ensuring there is access to courts if one of the parties presents a genuine challenge to the jurisdiction of the tribunal.

Key concepts: Tribunal, Jurisdiction, Competence (human resources), Law, Intervention (counseling), Political science, Subject-matter jurisdiction, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal: A Transnational Analysis of the Negative Effect of Competence-Competence — Research Paper | ScholarLens