2013Transportation Research Board eBooksRequires access

Energy Savings Strategies for Transit Agencies

Frank Gallivan, Synthesis Program, University of Washington

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This synthesis describes how transit agencies in the United States and Canada are reducing their energy use. This is being done not only by providing alternatives to travel in personal vehicles but also in other categories of energy savings strategies such as those dealing with vehicle technologies; vehicle operations, maintenance, and service design; non-revenue vehicles; stations and stops; building; indirect energy use; and renewable power generation. These strategies can reduce both an agency’s costs and its’ environmental footprint, and some can also improve service quality. A review of the relevant literature of a variety of academic and professional publications was conducted for this effort. A selected survey of 51 respondents out of 74 transportation providers located in large metro, small urban, and rural areas yielded a 69% response rate. Four transit providers highlighted more in-depth and additional details on successful practices, challenges, and lessons learned: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; King County Metro Transit, Seattle, Washington; Foothill Transit, West Covina, California; and 9 Town Transit, Connecticut River Estuary, Connecticut.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This synthesis describes how transit agencies in the United States and Canada are reducing their energy use. This is being done not only by providing alternatives to travel in personal vehicles but also in other categories of energy savings strategies such as those dealing with vehicle technologies; vehicle operations, maintenance, and service design; non-revenue vehicles; stations and stops; building; indirect energy use; and renewable power generation. These strategies can reduce both an agency’s costs and its’ environmental footprint, and some can also improve service quality. A review of the relevant literature of a variety of academic and professional publications was conducted for this effort. A selected survey of 51 respondents out of 74 transportation providers located in large metro, small urban, and rural areas yielded a 69% response rate. Four transit providers highlighted more in-depth and additional details on successful practices, challenges, and lessons learned: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; King County Metro Transit, Seattle, Washington; Foothill Transit, West Covina, California; and 9 Town Transit, Connecticut River Estuary, Connecticut.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This synthesis describes how transit agencies in the United States and Canada are reducing their energy use. This is being done not only by providing alternatives to travel in personal vehicles but also in other categories of energy savings strategies such as those dealing with vehicle technologies; vehicle operations, maintenance, and service design; non-revenue vehicles; stations and stops; building; indirect energy use; and renewable power generation. These strategies can reduce both an agency’s costs and its’ environmental footprint, and some can also improve service quality. A review of the relevant literature of a variety of academic and professional publications was conducted for this effort. A selected survey of 51 respondents out of 74 transportation providers located in large metro, small urban, and rural areas yielded a 69% response rate. Four transit providers highlighted more in-depth and additional details on successful practices, challenges, and lessons learned: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; King County Metro Transit, Seattle, Washington; Foothill Transit, West Covina, California; and 9 Town Transit, Connecticut River Estuary, Connecticut.

Key concepts: Transit (satellite), Energy (signal processing), Business, Environmental economics, Transport engineering, Economics, Engineering, Public transport

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Energy Savings Strategies for Transit Agencies — Research Paper | ScholarLens