1997•Journal of Ultrasound in MedicineOpen access

Comparison of sonography, sonohysterography, and hysteroscopy for evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding.

Mo H. Saidi, R. Kent Sadler, V D Theis, BD Akright, SA Farhart, Gloria R. Villanueva

Open full text 91 citations

Abstract

We compared transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding, Sixty-eight women 40 or older with abnormal uterine bleeding were assigned to undergo either transvaginal sonography or sonohysterography. All subjects then had diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Patients with abnormal findings underwent operative hysteroscopy or definitive therapy. Transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy revealed a sensitivity of 95%, 90%, and 78%, and a specificity of 65%, 83%, and 54%, respectively. The average cost for transvaginal sonography of sonohysterography was $195 and the cost for diagnostic hysteroscopy was $675. Transvaginal sonography and sonohysterography are cost-effective alternatives and more sensitive diagnostic tests than office diagnostic hysteroscopy.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compared transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding, Sixty-eight women 40 or older with abnormal uterine bleeding were assigned to undergo either transvaginal sonography or sonohysterography. All subjects then had diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Patients with abnormal findings underwent operative hysteroscopy or definitive therapy. Transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy revealed a sensitivity of 95%, 90%, and 78%, and a specificity of 65%, 83%, and 54%, respectively. The average cost for transvaginal sonography of sonohysterography was $195 and the cost for diagnostic hysteroscopy was $675. Transvaginal sonography and sonohysterography are cost-effective alternatives and more sensitive diagnostic tests than office diagnostic hysteroscopy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 91 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compared transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding, Sixty-eight women 40 or older with abnormal uterine bleeding were assigned to undergo either transvaginal sonography or sonohysterography. All subjects then had diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Patients with abnormal findings underwent operative hysteroscopy or definitive therapy. Transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy revealed a sensitivity of 95%, 90%, and 78%, and a specificity of 65%, 83%, and 54%, respectively. The average cost for transvaginal sonography of sonohysterography was $195 and the cost for diagnostic hysteroscopy was $675. Transvaginal sonography and sonohysterography are cost-effective alternatives and more sensitive diagnostic tests than office diagnostic hysteroscopy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Hysteroscopy, Transvaginal sonography, Uterine bleeding, Endometrial biopsy, Diagnostic accuracy, Radiology, Biopsy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of sonography, sonohysterography, and hysteroscopy for evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. — Research Paper | ScholarLens