2015Critical Studies on SecurityRequires access

Security: cosmopolitan, human, critical?

Simon Dalby

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Tony Burke’s ambitious manifesto for ‘cosmopolitan security’ raises numerous issues that need attention by security scholars. The remilitarization of security matters in the aftermath of 9/11 has drastically narrowed the scope of the human security agenda and reinforced the case for critique of the taken for granted contextualizations of contemporary politics. Challenging militarized forms of security discourse ‘from above’, as Burke does, supports the case for rethinking human security while simultaneously emphasizing the need for critique as a key scholarly practice in critical security studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Tony Burke’s ambitious manifesto for ‘cosmopolitan security’ raises numerous issues that need attention by security scholars. The remilitarization of security matters in the aftermath of 9/11 has drastically narrowed the scope of the human security agenda and reinforced the case for critique of the taken for granted contextualizations of contemporary politics. Challenging militarized forms of security discourse ‘from above’, as Burke does, supports the case for rethinking human security while simultaneously emphasizing the need for critique as a key scholarly practice in critical security studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Tony Burke’s ambitious manifesto for ‘cosmopolitan security’ raises numerous issues that need attention by security scholars. The remilitarization of security matters in the aftermath of 9/11 has drastically narrowed the scope of the human security agenda and reinforced the case for critique of the taken for granted contextualizations of contemporary politics. Challenging militarized forms of security discourse ‘from above’, as Burke does, supports the case for rethinking human security while simultaneously emphasizing the need for critique as a key scholarly practice in critical security studies.

Key concepts: Human security, Critical security studies, Security studies, Manifesto, International security, Scope (computer science), Political science, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Security: cosmopolitan, human, critical? — Research Paper | ScholarLens