Security: cosmopolitan, human, critical?
Simon Dalby
Abstract
Simon Dalby
Abstract
Tony Burke’s ambitious manifesto for ‘cosmopolitan security’ raises numerous issues that need attention by security scholars. The remilitarization of security matters in the aftermath of 9/11 has drastically narrowed the scope of the human security agenda and reinforced the case for critique of the taken for granted contextualizations of contemporary politics. Challenging militarized forms of security discourse ‘from above’, as Burke does, supports the case for rethinking human security while simultaneously emphasizing the need for critique as a key scholarly practice in critical security studies.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Tony Burke’s ambitious manifesto for ‘cosmopolitan security’ raises numerous issues that need attention by security scholars. The remilitarization of security matters in the aftermath of 9/11 has drastically narrowed the scope of the human security agenda and reinforced the case for critique of the taken for granted contextualizations of contemporary politics. Challenging militarized forms of security discourse ‘from above’, as Burke does, supports the case for rethinking human security while simultaneously emphasizing the need for critique as a key scholarly practice in critical security studies.
Key concepts: Human security, Critical security studies, Security studies, Manifesto, International security, Scope (computer science), Political science, Politics