2006•University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)Open access

Democracy and neo-liberal globalization

Mislav Kukoč

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Although the accelerated globalization of recent decades has flourished in tandem with a notable growth of liberal democracy in many states where it was previously absent, it would be hard to say that the prevailed processes of neo-liberal globalization foster development of global democracy.On the contrary, globalization has undercut traditional liberal democracy and created the need for supplementary democratic mechanisms.But, suprastate democracy of regional and transworld regimes as well as potential unofficial channels, such as global marketplace, global communications, and global civil society, have shown many democratic deficits rather than democratic credentials.the most serious problem in the relationship between democracy and globalization is, however, related to differences among the global cultures and/or civilizations.KeyWords democracy, neo

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although the accelerated globalization of recent decades has flourished in tandem with a notable growth of liberal democracy in many states where it was previously absent, it would be hard to say that the prevailed processes of neo-liberal globalization foster development of global democracy.On the contrary, globalization has undercut traditional liberal democracy and created the need for supplementary democratic mechanisms.But, suprastate democracy of regional and transworld regimes as well as potential unofficial channels, such as global marketplace, global communications, and global civil society, have shown many democratic deficits rather than democratic credentials.the most serious problem in the relationship between democracy and globalization is, however, related to differences among the global cultures and/or civilizations.KeyWords democracy, neo

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although the accelerated globalization of recent decades has flourished in tandem with a notable growth of liberal democracy in many states where it was previously absent, it would be hard to say that the prevailed processes of neo-liberal globalization foster development of global democracy.On the contrary, globalization has undercut traditional liberal democracy and created the need for supplementary democratic mechanisms.But, suprastate democracy of regional and transworld regimes as well as potential unofficial channels, such as global marketplace, global communications, and global civil society, have shown many democratic deficits rather than democratic credentials.the most serious problem in the relationship between democracy and globalization is, however, related to differences among the global cultures and/or civilizations.KeyWords democracy, neo

Key concepts: Democracy, Globalization, Liberal democracy, Political science, Political economy, Civil society, Representative democracy, Development economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Democracy and neo-liberal globalization — Research Paper | ScholarLens