Masculine bodies, feminine symbols: challenging gendered identities or compulsory femininity?
Cheryl A. Potgieter
Abstract
Cheryl A. Potgieter
Abstract
abstract This article explores the experiences of a group of men who dress and construct their bodies and identities as ‘feminine’. The article engages with and interprets the social, political, psychological and economic consequences of these constructions. The research suggests that even though participants present or express ‘alternative’ forms of masculinity and femininity in contemporary South Africa, established norms of hegemonic masculinity and femininity go relatively unchallenged by the participants' same-sex relationships. The article illustrates that gender and sex as flip sides of a coin is a simplistic construction. The argument motivates that future research should be conducted that provides additional insights into the gendered identities which these ‘women’ have internalised, reproduced, and possibly challenged in their everyday lives.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
abstract This article explores the experiences of a group of men who dress and construct their bodies and identities as ‘feminine’. The article engages with and interprets the social, political, psychological and economic consequences of these constructions. The research suggests that even though participants present or express ‘alternative’ forms of masculinity and femininity in contemporary South Africa, established norms of hegemonic masculinity and femininity go relatively unchallenged by the participants' same-sex relationships. The article illustrates that gender and sex as flip sides of a coin is a simplistic construction. The argument motivates that future research should be conducted that provides additional insights into the gendered identities which these ‘women’ have internalised, reproduced, and possibly challenged in their everyday lives.
Key concepts: Femininity, Masculinity, Argument (complex analysis), Gender studies, Construct (python library), Hegemony, Sociology, Politics