2014Qualitative Research in PsychologyRequires access

Engaging Phenomenological Analysis

Linda Finlay

Open publisher page 320 citations

Abstract

Phenomenologists seeking to explicate “lived experience” need above all to do justice to the phenomenon under study; research methods need to be responsive to the phenomenon, towards capturing something of its “is-ness.” This article aims to clarify some processes involved in doing phenomenological analysis, whatever the variant of phenomenology. A phenomenological sensibility is suggested rather than offering cookbook guidelines. Four key processes are identified: seeing afresh, dwelling, explicating, and languaging. Specific examples of research and writing are provided, with special attention to the principal phenomenological sources used in psychology: the “descriptive phenomenology” of Giorgi and Wertz, van Manen’s “hermeneutic phenomenology,” and Smith et al.’s “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” The article ends with my personal top ten tips for novice researchers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Phenomenologists seeking to explicate “lived experience” need above all to do justice to the phenomenon under study; research methods need to be responsive to the phenomenon, towards capturing something of its “is-ness.” This article aims to clarify some processes involved in doing phenomenological analysis, whatever the variant of phenomenology. A phenomenological sensibility is suggested rather than offering cookbook guidelines. Four key processes are identified: seeing afresh, dwelling, explicating, and languaging. Specific examples of research and writing are provided, with special attention to the principal phenomenological sources used in psychology: the “descriptive phenomenology” of Giorgi and Wertz, van Manen’s “hermeneutic phenomenology,” and Smith et al.’s “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” The article ends with my personal top ten tips for novice researchers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 320 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Phenomenologists seeking to explicate “lived experience” need above all to do justice to the phenomenon under study; research methods need to be responsive to the phenomenon, towards capturing something of its “is-ness.” This article aims to clarify some processes involved in doing phenomenological analysis, whatever the variant of phenomenology. A phenomenological sensibility is suggested rather than offering cookbook guidelines. Four key processes are identified: seeing afresh, dwelling, explicating, and languaging. Specific examples of research and writing are provided, with special attention to the principal phenomenological sources used in psychology: the “descriptive phenomenology” of Giorgi and Wertz, van Manen’s “hermeneutic phenomenology,” and Smith et al.’s “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” The article ends with my personal top ten tips for novice researchers.

Key concepts: Phenomenology (philosophy), Interpretative phenomenological analysis, Sensibility, Phenomenon, Epistemology, Lived experience, Psychology, Hermeneutic phenomenology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Engaging Phenomenological Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens