Is total duration of distal compound muscle action potential better than negative peak duration in the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy?
Julien Lagarde, Karine Viala, Emmanuel Fournier
Abstract
Julien Lagarde, Karine Viala, Emmanuel Fournier
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is difficult, and the role of electrophysiology is crucial. Distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) duration is a useful tool that is assessed by measuring negative peak duration (NP). The value of total distal CMAP duration (T), which seems more precise from a physiological standpoint, has not been studied. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the records of 50 patients with CIDP and 50 controls with chronic axonal neuropathy. We constructed ROC curves for NP and T. RESULTS: Comparison of AUC for T vs. NP showed an advantage for the former (P=0.026 for the fibular nerve). Our derived cut-offs offered a sensitivity of 42.3% for T vs. 35.3% for NP. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a slight advantage for T over NP duration of the distal CMAP in the diagnosis of CIDP. However, the clinical relevance of this result must be weighed against the feasibility of this measurement.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is difficult, and the role of electrophysiology is crucial. Distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) duration is a useful tool that is assessed by measuring negative peak duration (NP). The value of total distal CMAP duration (T), which seems more precise from a physiological standpoint, has not been studied. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the records of 50 patients with CIDP and 50 controls with chronic axonal neuropathy. We constructed ROC curves for NP and T. RESULTS: Comparison of AUC for T vs. NP showed an advantage for the former (P=0.026 for the fibular nerve). Our derived cut-offs offered a sensitivity of 42.3% for T vs. 35.3% for NP. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a slight advantage for T over NP duration of the distal CMAP in the diagnosis of CIDP. However, the clinical relevance of this result must be weighed against the feasibility of this measurement.
Key concepts: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Compound muscle action potential, Medicine, Polyneuropathy, Internal medicine, Clinical significance, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Duration (music)