2004•Unpublished venueRequires access

Downside Risk And Empirical Asset Pricing

Pim van. Auteur du texte Vliet

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

textabstractCurrently, the Nobel prize winning Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) celebrates its 40th birthday. Although widely applied in financial management, this model does not fully capture the empirical riskreturn relation of stocks; witness the beta, size, value and momentum effects. These problems may be caused by the use of variance as the relevant risk measure. This study analyzes if asset pricing models that use alternative risk measures better describe the empirical riskreturn trade-off. The results suggest that downside risk helps to better understand the cross-section of stock returns, especially during economic recessions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

textabstractCurrently, the Nobel prize winning Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) celebrates its 40th birthday. Although widely applied in financial management, this model does not fully capture the empirical riskreturn relation of stocks; witness the beta, size, value and momentum effects. These problems may be caused by the use of variance as the relevant risk measure. This study analyzes if asset pricing models that use alternative risk measures better describe the empirical riskreturn trade-off. The results suggest that downside risk helps to better understand the cross-section of stock returns, especially during economic recessions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

textabstractCurrently, the Nobel prize winning Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) celebrates its 40th birthday. Although widely applied in financial management, this model does not fully capture the empirical riskreturn relation of stocks; witness the beta, size, value and momentum effects. These problems may be caused by the use of variance as the relevant risk measure. This study analyzes if asset pricing models that use alternative risk measures better describe the empirical riskreturn trade-off. The results suggest that downside risk helps to better understand the cross-section of stock returns, especially during economic recessions.

Key concepts: Capital asset pricing model, Downside risk, Economics, Financial economics, Consumption-based capital asset pricing model, Stock (firearms), Recession, Econometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Downside Risk And Empirical Asset Pricing — Research Paper | ScholarLens