Downside Risk And Empirical Asset Pricing
Pim van. Auteur du texte Vliet
Abstract
Pim van. Auteur du texte Vliet
Abstract
textabstractCurrently, the Nobel prize winning Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) celebrates its 40th birthday. Although widely applied in financial management, this model does not fully capture the empirical riskreturn relation of stocks; witness the beta, size, value and momentum effects. These problems may be caused by the use of variance as the relevant risk measure. This study analyzes if asset pricing models that use alternative risk measures better describe the empirical riskreturn trade-off. The results suggest that downside risk helps to better understand the cross-section of stock returns, especially during economic recessions.
OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
textabstractCurrently, the Nobel prize winning Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) celebrates its 40th birthday. Although widely applied in financial management, this model does not fully capture the empirical riskreturn relation of stocks; witness the beta, size, value and momentum effects. These problems may be caused by the use of variance as the relevant risk measure. This study analyzes if asset pricing models that use alternative risk measures better describe the empirical riskreturn trade-off. The results suggest that downside risk helps to better understand the cross-section of stock returns, especially during economic recessions.
Key concepts: Capital asset pricing model, Downside risk, Economics, Financial economics, Consumption-based capital asset pricing model, Stock (firearms), Recession, Econometrics