2009Center for International and Regional Studies (Georgetown University)Open access

Sprouting fiduciary duty of honesty and fidelity: Companies Act 2006

Mark Hsiao

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Directors’ duties have been well established in case law. The case law is by no means a black-letter law on which duty is of fiduciary nature. Arguably, one of the purposes of statutory codification serves to this end. However, s.170(4) of Companies Act 2006 refers to the application of common law and equitable principles to the general duties; this focuses attention on what constitutes a fiduciary duty, as it defines neither fiduciary duties nor strict duties. First, the question remains regarding to what extent a dutyconstitutes a fiduciary duty. For the classification of a fiduciary duty will plausibly confirm a substantive institutional proprietary interest. Secondly, with the assistance of the notion of honesty and loyalty, how might courts ascertain whether a statutory duty is also a fiduciary duty?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Directors’ duties have been well established in case law. The case law is by no means a black-letter law on which duty is of fiduciary nature. Arguably, one of the purposes of statutory codification serves to this end. However, s.170(4) of Companies Act 2006 refers to the application of common law and equitable principles to the general duties; this focuses attention on what constitutes a fiduciary duty, as it defines neither fiduciary duties nor strict duties. First, the question remains regarding to what extent a dutyconstitutes a fiduciary duty. For the classification of a fiduciary duty will plausibly confirm a substantive institutional proprietary interest. Secondly, with the assistance of the notion of honesty and loyalty, how might courts ascertain whether a statutory duty is also a fiduciary duty?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Directors’ duties have been well established in case law. The case law is by no means a black-letter law on which duty is of fiduciary nature. Arguably, one of the purposes of statutory codification serves to this end. However, s.170(4) of Companies Act 2006 refers to the application of common law and equitable principles to the general duties; this focuses attention on what constitutes a fiduciary duty, as it defines neither fiduciary duties nor strict duties. First, the question remains regarding to what extent a dutyconstitutes a fiduciary duty. For the classification of a fiduciary duty will plausibly confirm a substantive institutional proprietary interest. Secondly, with the assistance of the notion of honesty and loyalty, how might courts ascertain whether a statutory duty is also a fiduciary duty?

Key concepts: Fiduciary, Duty, Statutory law, Honesty, Law, Duty of loyalty, Business, Common law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sprouting fiduciary duty of honesty and fidelity: Companies Act 2006 — Research Paper | ScholarLens