Integral Abutment and Jointless Bridges
Vasant C. Mistry
Abstract
Vasant C. Mistry
Abstract
The most frequently encountered corrosion problem involves leaking expansion joints and seals that permit salt-laden run-off water from the roadway surface to attack the girder ends, bearings and supporting reinforced concrete substructures. Because neither the materials used nor the pains taken to mitigate joint leakage can fully resolve these problems, other options such as, the construction of jointless bridges, the use of integral or semi-integral abutments, and moving the joints beyond the bridges should be sought. Since 1987, numerous States have adopted integral abutment bridges as structures of choice when conditions allow. At least 40 States are now building some form of jointless bridges. While superstructures with deck-end joints still predominate, the trend appears to be moving toward integral. This paper presents some of the important features of integral abutment and jointless bridge design and some guidelines to achieve improved design. The intent of this paper is to enhance the awareness among the engineering community to use integral abutment and jointless bridges wherever possible.
OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The most frequently encountered corrosion problem involves leaking expansion joints and seals that permit salt-laden run-off water from the roadway surface to attack the girder ends, bearings and supporting reinforced concrete substructures. Because neither the materials used nor the pains taken to mitigate joint leakage can fully resolve these problems, other options such as, the construction of jointless bridges, the use of integral or semi-integral abutments, and moving the joints beyond the bridges should be sought. Since 1987, numerous States have adopted integral abutment bridges as structures of choice when conditions allow. At least 40 States are now building some form of jointless bridges. While superstructures with deck-end joints still predominate, the trend appears to be moving toward integral. This paper presents some of the important features of integral abutment and jointless bridge design and some guidelines to achieve improved design. The intent of this paper is to enhance the awareness among the engineering community to use integral abutment and jointless bridges wherever possible.
Key concepts: Abutment, Expansion joint, Deck, Girder, Bridge deck, Joint (building), Structural engineering, Engineering