Mechanical Feller-buncher felling: an example study on timber value recovery in South Africa: management paper
Steven Kewley, Loren Kollegg
Abstract
Steven Kewley, Loren Kollegg
Abstract
Timber breakage during felling reduced the value of timber harvested from a stand. This is especially evident in the larger saw timber stands where large trees are being harvested. A field study was completed with the objective of quantifying and comparing the timber value recovery between conventional chainsaw felling, and mechanical feller-buncher felling, using two pine species - Pinus elliottii and Pinus taeda. Although there was no significant difference in mean volume recovery, felling with the feller-buncher yielded a 2.4% higher volume recovery than chainsaw felling. Mean value recovery, however, for felling with the feller-buncher was significantly higher than chainsaw felling. Study results showed that feller-buncher felling had a 6.8% lower tree value recovery than chainsaw felling. The difference is attributed to a decrease in breakage and improved sawlog recovery when felling with the feller-buncher. Southern African Forestry Journal No.192 2001: 59-64
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Timber breakage during felling reduced the value of timber harvested from a stand. This is especially evident in the larger saw timber stands where large trees are being harvested. A field study was completed with the objective of quantifying and comparing the timber value recovery between conventional chainsaw felling, and mechanical feller-buncher felling, using two pine species - Pinus elliottii and Pinus taeda. Although there was no significant difference in mean volume recovery, felling with the feller-buncher yielded a 2.4% higher volume recovery than chainsaw felling. Mean value recovery, however, for felling with the feller-buncher was significantly higher than chainsaw felling. Study results showed that feller-buncher felling had a 6.8% lower tree value recovery than chainsaw felling. The difference is attributed to a decrease in breakage and improved sawlog recovery when felling with the feller-buncher. Southern African Forestry Journal No.192 2001: 59-64
Key concepts: Felling, Forestry, Breakage, Agroforestry, Mathematics, Significant difference, Environmental science, Geography