2001Unpublished venueRequires access

Mechanical Feller-buncher felling: an example study on timber value recovery in South Africa: management paper

Steven Kewley, Loren Kollegg

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Timber breakage during felling reduced the value of timber harvested from a stand. This is especially evident in the larger saw timber stands where large trees are being harvested. A field study was completed with the objective of quantifying and comparing the timber value recovery between conventional chainsaw felling, and mechanical feller-buncher felling, using two pine species - Pinus elliottii and Pinus taeda. Although there was no significant difference in mean volume recovery, felling with the feller-buncher yielded a 2.4% higher volume recovery than chainsaw felling. Mean value recovery, however, for felling with the feller-buncher was significantly higher than chainsaw felling. Study results showed that feller-buncher felling had a 6.8% lower tree value recovery than chainsaw felling. The difference is attributed to a decrease in breakage and improved sawlog recovery when felling with the feller-buncher. Southern African Forestry Journal No.192 2001: 59-64

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Timber breakage during felling reduced the value of timber harvested from a stand. This is especially evident in the larger saw timber stands where large trees are being harvested. A field study was completed with the objective of quantifying and comparing the timber value recovery between conventional chainsaw felling, and mechanical feller-buncher felling, using two pine species - Pinus elliottii and Pinus taeda. Although there was no significant difference in mean volume recovery, felling with the feller-buncher yielded a 2.4% higher volume recovery than chainsaw felling. Mean value recovery, however, for felling with the feller-buncher was significantly higher than chainsaw felling. Study results showed that feller-buncher felling had a 6.8% lower tree value recovery than chainsaw felling. The difference is attributed to a decrease in breakage and improved sawlog recovery when felling with the feller-buncher. Southern African Forestry Journal No.192 2001: 59-64

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Timber breakage during felling reduced the value of timber harvested from a stand. This is especially evident in the larger saw timber stands where large trees are being harvested. A field study was completed with the objective of quantifying and comparing the timber value recovery between conventional chainsaw felling, and mechanical feller-buncher felling, using two pine species - Pinus elliottii and Pinus taeda. Although there was no significant difference in mean volume recovery, felling with the feller-buncher yielded a 2.4% higher volume recovery than chainsaw felling. Mean value recovery, however, for felling with the feller-buncher was significantly higher than chainsaw felling. Study results showed that feller-buncher felling had a 6.8% lower tree value recovery than chainsaw felling. The difference is attributed to a decrease in breakage and improved sawlog recovery when felling with the feller-buncher. Southern African Forestry Journal No.192 2001: 59-64

Key concepts: Felling, Forestry, Breakage, Agroforestry, Mathematics, Significant difference, Environmental science, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mechanical Feller-buncher felling: an example study on timber value recovery in South Africa: management paper — Research Paper | ScholarLens