1994•Journal of NeurophysiologyRequires access

Surround inhibition among projection neurons is weak or nonexistent in the rat neostriatum

Dieter Jaeger, Hitoshi Kita, Charles John Wilson

Open publisher page 234 citations

Abstract

1. Antidromic activation of striatal spiny projection neurons by substantia nigra stimulation in vivo did not evoke inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in the antidromically activated neurons, or in neighboring spiny neurons. 2. More generalized activation of projection cells by stimulation of the efferent pathway in slices did not evoke IPSPs in spiny neurons. Inhibitory mechanisms were operative in these slices, as indicated by the presence of an IPSP component in the orthodromic response to local stimulation. 3. Dual intracellular recordings, obtained from cells located within 50-200 microns of each other in striatal slices also failed to demonstrate any inhibition among striatal spiny cells. Spikes triggered in one spiny neuron by current injection failed to produce any postsynaptic potential in nearby spiny cells at resting or depolarized membrane potentials. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) evoked by electrical stimulation of the cortex were not affected by spiking of neighboring cells. 4. It is impossible to rule out the presence of inhibition among striatal spiny neurons in all circumstances. However, the absence of demonstrable IPSPs in these experiments argue against the common view that mutual inhibition among spiny neurons is a central organizing principle of striatal function.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1. Antidromic activation of striatal spiny projection neurons by substantia nigra stimulation in vivo did not evoke inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in the antidromically activated neurons, or in neighboring spiny neurons. 2. More generalized activation of projection cells by stimulation of the efferent pathway in slices did not evoke IPSPs in spiny neurons. Inhibitory mechanisms were operative in these slices, as indicated by the presence of an IPSP component in the orthodromic response to local stimulation. 3. Dual intracellular recordings, obtained from cells located within 50-200 microns of each other in striatal slices also failed to demonstrate any inhibition among striatal spiny cells. Spikes triggered in one spiny neuron by current injection failed to produce any postsynaptic potential in nearby spiny cells at resting or depolarized membrane potentials. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) evoked by electrical stimulation of the cortex were not affected by spiking of neighboring cells. 4. It is impossible to rule out the presence of inhibition among striatal spiny neurons in all circumstances. However, the absence of demonstrable IPSPs in these experiments argue against the common view that mutual inhibition among spiny neurons is a central organizing principle of striatal function.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 234 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1. Antidromic activation of striatal spiny projection neurons by substantia nigra stimulation in vivo did not evoke inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in the antidromically activated neurons, or in neighboring spiny neurons. 2. More generalized activation of projection cells by stimulation of the efferent pathway in slices did not evoke IPSPs in spiny neurons. Inhibitory mechanisms were operative in these slices, as indicated by the presence of an IPSP component in the orthodromic response to local stimulation. 3. Dual intracellular recordings, obtained from cells located within 50-200 microns of each other in striatal slices also failed to demonstrate any inhibition among striatal spiny cells. Spikes triggered in one spiny neuron by current injection failed to produce any postsynaptic potential in nearby spiny cells at resting or depolarized membrane potentials. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) evoked by electrical stimulation of the cortex were not affected by spiking of neighboring cells. 4. It is impossible to rule out the presence of inhibition among striatal spiny neurons in all circumstances. However, the absence of demonstrable IPSPs in these experiments argue against the common view that mutual inhibition among spiny neurons is a central organizing principle of striatal function.

Key concepts: Medium spiny neuron, Orthodromic, Antidromic, Inhibitory postsynaptic potential, Neuroscience, Excitatory postsynaptic potential, Postsynaptic potential, Stimulation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Surround inhibition among projection neurons is weak or nonexistent in the rat neostriatum — Research Paper | ScholarLens