Productivity, economics and energetics of wheat under different methods of crop establishment and irrigation schedules
A. S. Brar, S. S. Mahal, J. S. Deol, G. S. Buttar
Abstract
A. S. Brar, S. S. Mahal, J. S. Deol, G. S. Buttar
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to study the influence of methods of sowing and irrigation schedules on productivity, economics and energetics of wheat, during 2005-06 and 2006-07. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design, with three methods of crop establishment i. e. conventional, bed planting and zero-till in main plots and three irrigation schedules viz. 1.25, 1.00, and 0.75 IW:CPE in sub plots with four replications. The grain yield of wheat did not vary significantly with different methods of crop establishment. However, zero-till sowing was found to be more remunerative in terms of net returns, benefit: cost and specific energy over conventional and bed planting. Among the irrigation schedules maximum grain yield (48.2 q/ha) was obtained when irrigation applied at 1.25 IW: CPE, which was statistically at par with 1.0 IW: CPE (46.8 q/ha), but both were significantly better than irrigation applied at 0.75 IW: CPE (43.7 q/ha). Similar trend was observed for net returns and benefit: cost, while reverse was true for economic water productivity. Maximum energy output (70854 MJ/ha) was recorded with irrigation scheduling at 1.25 IW: CPE followed by 1.0 (68796 MJ/ha) and least in 0.75 (64239 MJ/ha) IW: CPE. However, energy input was the lowest (12225 MJ/ha) in irrigation schedule of 0.75 IW: CPE, which was 18.8 and 13.8 per cent less than irrigation schedules of 1.25 and 1.0 IW: CPE, respectively.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A field experiment was conducted to study the influence of methods of sowing and irrigation schedules on productivity, economics and energetics of wheat, during 2005-06 and 2006-07. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design, with three methods of crop establishment i. e. conventional, bed planting and zero-till in main plots and three irrigation schedules viz. 1.25, 1.00, and 0.75 IW:CPE in sub plots with four replications. The grain yield of wheat did not vary significantly with different methods of crop establishment. However, zero-till sowing was found to be more remunerative in terms of net returns, benefit: cost and specific energy over conventional and bed planting. Among the irrigation schedules maximum grain yield (48.2 q/ha) was obtained when irrigation applied at 1.25 IW: CPE, which was statistically at par with 1.0 IW: CPE (46.8 q/ha), but both were significantly better than irrigation applied at 0.75 IW: CPE (43.7 q/ha). Similar trend was observed for net returns and benefit: cost, while reverse was true for economic water productivity. Maximum energy output (70854 MJ/ha) was recorded with irrigation scheduling at 1.25 IW: CPE followed by 1.0 (68796 MJ/ha) and least in 0.75 (64239 MJ/ha) IW: CPE. However, energy input was the lowest (12225 MJ/ha) in irrigation schedule of 0.75 IW: CPE, which was 18.8 and 13.8 per cent less than irrigation schedules of 1.25 and 1.0 IW: CPE, respectively.
Key concepts: Sowing, Irrigation, Irrigation scheduling, Mathematics, Crop, Agronomy, Field experiment, Productivity