2014•Teaching and LearningRequires access

A Positive Constructivist: An Internal Debate on Opposing Educational Philosophies

Deborah Weston

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to reconcile the academic tensions the author experiences between two opposing philosophical epistemologies: positivism and constructivism. The history and epistemological implications of positivism and constructivism are examined. The author debates the use of each philosophy within the context of educational research, linking positivism with quantitative research and constructivism with qualitative research. Teaching practices are examined through the lens of each philosophy. Constructivism is connected to the work of Vygotsky, Piaget, and Dewey. The use of positivism is examined in education. The paper explores how transparency within research methods can counteract the misuse of quantitative data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this paper is to reconcile the academic tensions the author experiences between two opposing philosophical epistemologies: positivism and constructivism. The history and epistemological implications of positivism and constructivism are examined. The author debates the use of each philosophy within the context of educational research, linking positivism with quantitative research and constructivism with qualitative research. Teaching practices are examined through the lens of each philosophy. Constructivism is connected to the work of Vygotsky, Piaget, and Dewey. The use of positivism is examined in education. The paper explores how transparency within research methods can counteract the misuse of quantitative data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this paper is to reconcile the academic tensions the author experiences between two opposing philosophical epistemologies: positivism and constructivism. The history and epistemological implications of positivism and constructivism are examined. The author debates the use of each philosophy within the context of educational research, linking positivism with quantitative research and constructivism with qualitative research. Teaching practices are examined through the lens of each philosophy. Constructivism is connected to the work of Vygotsky, Piaget, and Dewey. The use of positivism is examined in education. The paper explores how transparency within research methods can counteract the misuse of quantitative data.

Key concepts: Constructivism (international relations), Positivism, Epistemology, Logical positivism, Sociology, Social constructivism, Philosophy, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Positive Constructivist: An Internal Debate on Opposing Educational Philosophies — Research Paper | ScholarLens