2008•Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))Requires access

From adjective to prefix : lexicalization and grammaticalization of French ancien/nouveau + N

Kristel Van Goethem

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

"In our paper, we will claim that, once lexicalized, some compounds undergo a further process by which they end up as derivations. This claim implies that there is not only a continuum between syntax and compounding, but also between compounding and derivation. In other words, it would mean that, just like Germanic languages, French makes use of “affixoids”, i.e. an intermediate class of elements in between stems and affixes (cf. ten Hacken 2000, Meesters 2002, Booij 2005a & 2005b). The process by which the stem of a compound develops into an affix is not an instance of lexicalization, but will be motivated to illustrate a particular case of grammaticalization (cf. Booij 2005a). From a theoretical point of view, this\nmeans that lexicalization and grammaticalization will not be considered converse, but complementary (cf. Lehmann 2002, Brinton & Traugott 2005)."

About this research paper

What this paper is about

"In our paper, we will claim that, once lexicalized, some compounds undergo a further process by which they end up as derivations. This claim implies that there is not only a continuum between syntax and compounding, but also between compounding and derivation. In other words, it would mean that, just like Germanic languages, French makes use of “affixoids”, i.e. an intermediate class of elements in between stems and affixes (cf. ten Hacken 2000, Meesters 2002, Booij 2005a & 2005b). The process by which the stem of a compound develops into an affix is not an instance of lexicalization, but will be motivated to illustrate a particular case of grammaticalization (cf. Booij 2005a). From a theoretical point of view, this\nmeans that lexicalization and grammaticalization will not be considered converse, but complementary (cf. Lehmann 2002, Brinton & Traugott 2005)."

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

"In our paper, we will claim that, once lexicalized, some compounds undergo a further process by which they end up as derivations. This claim implies that there is not only a continuum between syntax and compounding, but also between compounding and derivation. In other words, it would mean that, just like Germanic languages, French makes use of “affixoids”, i.e. an intermediate class of elements in between stems and affixes (cf. ten Hacken 2000, Meesters 2002, Booij 2005a & 2005b). The process by which the stem of a compound develops into an affix is not an instance of lexicalization, but will be motivated to illustrate a particular case of grammaticalization (cf. Booij 2005a). From a theoretical point of view, this\nmeans that lexicalization and grammaticalization will not be considered converse, but complementary (cf. Lehmann 2002, Brinton & Traugott 2005)."

Key concepts: Lexicalization, Grammaticalization, Linguistics, Affix, Prefix, Philosophy, Verb, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From adjective to prefix : lexicalization and grammaticalization of French ancien/nouveau + N — Research Paper | ScholarLens