1994•Medical Entomology and ZoologyRequires access

Affirmative Action International Perspectives

Julio Faúndez

Open publisher page 65 citations

Abstract

This work outlines perspectives essential to understanding the debate on affirmative action. Affirmative action is used as a social policy tool in several countries around the world, and is endorsed in some constitutions, laws and international human rights conventions. Nevertheless, it is controversial, especially because both its proponents and critics rely on the notion of equality to justify their position. Even when they agree about the need to equalize opportunities, they argue over how this is to be done.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This work outlines perspectives essential to understanding the debate on affirmative action. Affirmative action is used as a social policy tool in several countries around the world, and is endorsed in some constitutions, laws and international human rights conventions. Nevertheless, it is controversial, especially because both its proponents and critics rely on the notion of equality to justify their position. Even when they agree about the need to equalize opportunities, they argue over how this is to be done.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 65 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This work outlines perspectives essential to understanding the debate on affirmative action. Affirmative action is used as a social policy tool in several countries around the world, and is endorsed in some constitutions, laws and international human rights conventions. Nevertheless, it is controversial, especially because both its proponents and critics rely on the notion of equality to justify their position. Even when they agree about the need to equalize opportunities, they argue over how this is to be done.

Key concepts: Affirmative action, Political science, Law and economics, Action (physics), Position (finance), Human rights, Work (physics), Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Affirmative Action International Perspectives — Research Paper | ScholarLens