1985•Energy Technol. (Wash., D.C.); (United States)Requires access

Utility's Decision to Establish an Energy Services Subsidiary.

Mike Weedall

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A survey of 30 utilities found a growing trend for public utilities to diversify beyond their traditional services. The author examines one area of diversification: the establishment of an energy service company as a separate subsidiary outside the regulated arena. He defines energy services to include auditing, installation, operations, maintenance, and financing on a turnkey basis, but does not cover cogeneration activities. The utilities justify this activity on the basis of business opportunities, customer service and response to private competition, utility skills and opportunity for employees, the need for load shaping, and regulatory push. Utilities which decide not to diversify cite the lack of appropriate skills or adequate return and regulation among their reasons. Other utilities adopted joint venture guarantee savings, or purchase energy savings as alternatives to diversification. 3 tables.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A survey of 30 utilities found a growing trend for public utilities to diversify beyond their traditional services. The author examines one area of diversification: the establishment of an energy service company as a separate subsidiary outside the regulated arena. He defines energy services to include auditing, installation, operations, maintenance, and financing on a turnkey basis, but does not cover cogeneration activities. The utilities justify this activity on the basis of business opportunities, customer service and response to private competition, utility skills and opportunity for employees, the need for load shaping, and regulatory push. Utilities which decide not to diversify cite the lack of appropriate skills or adequate return and regulation among their reasons. Other utilities adopted joint venture guarantee savings, or purchase energy savings as alternatives to diversification. 3 tables.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A survey of 30 utilities found a growing trend for public utilities to diversify beyond their traditional services. The author examines one area of diversification: the establishment of an energy service company as a separate subsidiary outside the regulated arena. He defines energy services to include auditing, installation, operations, maintenance, and financing on a turnkey basis, but does not cover cogeneration activities. The utilities justify this activity on the basis of business opportunities, customer service and response to private competition, utility skills and opportunity for employees, the need for load shaping, and regulatory push. Utilities which decide not to diversify cite the lack of appropriate skills or adequate return and regulation among their reasons. Other utilities adopted joint venture guarantee savings, or purchase energy savings as alternatives to diversification. 3 tables.

Key concepts: Turnkey, Diversification (marketing strategy), Business, Audit, Electric utility, Market penetration, Finance, Service (business)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source