2007•Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)Requires access

Dynamic and Static Hedging of Barrier options

Anders Nilsson, Jon D. Andersson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this paper the performance of a static hedging strategy of European barrier options are evaluated, first introduced by Carr, Ellis and Gupta in 1998. Two dynamic hedging strategies are used as benchmarks; the delta hedging and delta-gamma hedging strategy, respectively. To increase realism to the system only discrete rebalancing of the replicating portfolios are possible. In addition, transaction costs are assumed and included. The analysis is limited to the down-and-out and up-and-out call European options. Hedging of European put barrier options could easily be constructed from the put-call-parity and European in-barrier options from the fact that a European option is equal to the sum of the in- and out-barrier option with the same barrier. The static hedge outperforms the two dynamic hedging strategies in particular when transaction costs are included. The static hedge is more successful in reducing the risk and delivers a higher average return.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper the performance of a static hedging strategy of European barrier options are evaluated, first introduced by Carr, Ellis and Gupta in 1998. Two dynamic hedging strategies are used as benchmarks; the delta hedging and delta-gamma hedging strategy, respectively. To increase realism to the system only discrete rebalancing of the replicating portfolios are possible. In addition, transaction costs are assumed and included. The analysis is limited to the down-and-out and up-and-out call European options. Hedging of European put barrier options could easily be constructed from the put-call-parity and European in-barrier options from the fact that a European option is equal to the sum of the in- and out-barrier option with the same barrier. The static hedge outperforms the two dynamic hedging strategies in particular when transaction costs are included. The static hedge is more successful in reducing the risk and delivers a higher average return.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper the performance of a static hedging strategy of European barrier options are evaluated, first introduced by Carr, Ellis and Gupta in 1998. Two dynamic hedging strategies are used as benchmarks; the delta hedging and delta-gamma hedging strategy, respectively. To increase realism to the system only discrete rebalancing of the replicating portfolios are possible. In addition, transaction costs are assumed and included. The analysis is limited to the down-and-out and up-and-out call European options. Hedging of European put barrier options could easily be constructed from the put-call-parity and European in-barrier options from the fact that a European option is equal to the sum of the in- and out-barrier option with the same barrier. The static hedge outperforms the two dynamic hedging strategies in particular when transaction costs are included. The static hedge is more successful in reducing the risk and delivers a higher average return.

Key concepts: Hedge, Barrier option, Call option, Exotic option, Transaction cost, Economics, Computer science, Actuarial science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dynamic and Static Hedging of Barrier options — Research Paper | ScholarLens