Learning Spaces as Social Capital
Paul H. Temple
Abstract
Paul H. Temple
Abstract
The premise of this chapter is that space (and place: which I define here as what people make of the space they inhabit) is an under-acknowledged independent variable in understanding how higher education institutions work. Space in the university takes the form it does as a result of the decisions and actions of its designers, its users, those who manage it in various ways, and those who look after it. But may there also be a sense in which space and place help to determine what the university is? As Hillier and Hanson (1984, p. 2) argue, ‘the ordering of space in buildings is really about the ordering of relations between people’
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The premise of this chapter is that space (and place: which I define here as what people make of the space they inhabit) is an under-acknowledged independent variable in understanding how higher education institutions work. Space in the university takes the form it does as a result of the decisions and actions of its designers, its users, those who manage it in various ways, and those who look after it. But may there also be a sense in which space and place help to determine what the university is? As Hillier and Hanson (1984, p. 2) argue, ‘the ordering of space in buildings is really about the ordering of relations between people’
Key concepts: Premise, Space (punctuation), Social capital, Social space, Sociology, Work (physics), Epistemology, Capital (architecture)