1995OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

The effect of flotation costs and brokerage fees on the cost of common equity of public utilities

J. Nicdao-Cuyugan, A.S. Pregozen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Flotation costs incurred to externally raise common equity cause utility investment funds to be less than the amount of investor contributions, thereby increasing their cost of common equity. Regulated utilities obtain compensation for flotation costs through an adjustment to their allowed rate of return on common equity. However, the proper method of flotation cost compensation is a subject of controversy. It has been argued in this publication, and in various regulatory arenas, that flotation cost adjustment methods for the discounted cash flow (DCF) model overestimate the cost of common equity if the stock price is not adjusted to reflect brokerage fees incurred by the investor. This paper presents a critical analysis of this argument as formalized by David S. Habr in an article published in the NRRI Quarterly Bulletin. This analysis demonstrates that Habr`s conclusions are incorrect and his model is inappropriate for determining a utility`s flotation cost adjustment. Adjusting a utility`s allowed return on equity to reflect the brokerage fees paid by investors will underestimate the utility`s true cost of common equity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Flotation costs incurred to externally raise common equity cause utility investment funds to be less than the amount of investor contributions, thereby increasing their cost of common equity. Regulated utilities obtain compensation for flotation costs through an adjustment to their allowed rate of return on common equity. However, the proper method of flotation cost compensation is a subject of controversy. It has been argued in this publication, and in various regulatory arenas, that flotation cost adjustment methods for the discounted cash flow (DCF) model overestimate the cost of common equity if the stock price is not adjusted to reflect brokerage fees incurred by the investor. This paper presents a critical analysis of this argument as formalized by David S. Habr in an article published in the NRRI Quarterly Bulletin. This analysis demonstrates that Habr`s conclusions are incorrect and his model is inappropriate for determining a utility`s flotation cost adjustment. Adjusting a utility`s allowed return on equity to reflect the brokerage fees paid by investors will underestimate the utility`s true cost of common equity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Flotation costs incurred to externally raise common equity cause utility investment funds to be less than the amount of investor contributions, thereby increasing their cost of common equity. Regulated utilities obtain compensation for flotation costs through an adjustment to their allowed rate of return on common equity. However, the proper method of flotation cost compensation is a subject of controversy. It has been argued in this publication, and in various regulatory arenas, that flotation cost adjustment methods for the discounted cash flow (DCF) model overestimate the cost of common equity if the stock price is not adjusted to reflect brokerage fees incurred by the investor. This paper presents a critical analysis of this argument as formalized by David S. Habr in an article published in the NRRI Quarterly Bulletin. This analysis demonstrates that Habr`s conclusions are incorrect and his model is inappropriate for determining a utility`s flotation cost adjustment. Adjusting a utility`s allowed return on equity to reflect the brokerage fees paid by investors will underestimate the utility`s true cost of common equity.

Key concepts: Equity (law), Economics, Cost of equity, Cash flow, Discounted cash flow, Common stock, Equity risk, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of flotation costs and brokerage fees on the cost of common equity of public utilities — Research Paper | ScholarLens