2007Chemical Biology & Drug DesignRequires access

Research Letter: Retroinverso Mimetics of S Peptide

Jagdish Rai

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

The S peptide from ribonuclease S was used as a model system to explore the relationship between the native peptide and its retroinverso (RI) analog. As probed by circular dichroism, the conformations of S peptide and retroinverso S peptide (RIS peptide) are each right-handed helical conformation. The helical propensity of retro S peptide is greater than S peptide, in trifluoroethanol (TFE). In 70% TFE, the S peptide possesses greater helicity at pH 4 than at pH 7, whereas RIS peptide possesses greater helicity at pH 7 than at pH 4. The RIS peptide does not mimic the S peptide in binding to S protein. Specifically, the RIS peptide does not mimic the S peptide to effect RNase activity with S protein and it also does not inhibit the RNase activity of S peptide with S protein. The biological mimicry between the S peptide and its RIS analog depends on the conformation and relatedness of both the side chain and backbone substructures. The backbones in the S peptide and its RIS analog are reverted with respect to each other; however, the side chain patterns are predicted to be similar. Importantly, if the molecular interactions of backbone atoms of the S peptide and its binding to S protein, then the RIS analog would be unlikely to mimic this parent peptide.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The S peptide from ribonuclease S was used as a model system to explore the relationship between the native peptide and its retroinverso (RI) analog. As probed by circular dichroism, the conformations of S peptide and retroinverso S peptide (RIS peptide) are each right-handed helical conformation. The helical propensity of retro S peptide is greater than S peptide, in trifluoroethanol (TFE). In 70% TFE, the S peptide possesses greater helicity at pH 4 than at pH 7, whereas RIS peptide possesses greater helicity at pH 7 than at pH 4. The RIS peptide does not mimic the S peptide in binding to S protein. Specifically, the RIS peptide does not mimic the S peptide to effect RNase activity with S protein and it also does not inhibit the RNase activity of S peptide with S protein. The biological mimicry between the S peptide and its RIS analog depends on the conformation and relatedness of both the side chain and backbone substructures. The backbones in the S peptide and its RIS analog are reverted with respect to each other; however, the side chain patterns are predicted to be similar. Importantly, if the molecular interactions of backbone atoms of the S peptide and its binding to S protein, then the RIS analog would be unlikely to mimic this parent peptide.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The S peptide from ribonuclease S was used as a model system to explore the relationship between the native peptide and its retroinverso (RI) analog. As probed by circular dichroism, the conformations of S peptide and retroinverso S peptide (RIS peptide) are each right-handed helical conformation. The helical propensity of retro S peptide is greater than S peptide, in trifluoroethanol (TFE). In 70% TFE, the S peptide possesses greater helicity at pH 4 than at pH 7, whereas RIS peptide possesses greater helicity at pH 7 than at pH 4. The RIS peptide does not mimic the S peptide in binding to S protein. Specifically, the RIS peptide does not mimic the S peptide to effect RNase activity with S protein and it also does not inhibit the RNase activity of S peptide with S protein. The biological mimicry between the S peptide and its RIS analog depends on the conformation and relatedness of both the side chain and backbone substructures. The backbones in the S peptide and its RIS analog are reverted with respect to each other; however, the side chain patterns are predicted to be similar. Importantly, if the molecular interactions of backbone atoms of the S peptide and its binding to S protein, then the RIS analog would be unlikely to mimic this parent peptide.

Key concepts: Peptide, RNase P, Circular dichroism, Ribonuclease, Chemistry, Peptide sequence, Peptide Conformation, Protein structure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Research Letter: Retroinverso Mimetics of S Peptide — Research Paper | ScholarLens