2003PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of hearing levels and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques: preliminary results].

Mehmet Ali Solmaz, Emre A. Yucel, Mustafa Özdemir, Yahya Güldíken, Kemal Değer

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We compared the levels of hearing and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tympanoplasty procedures with the use of cartilage palisade (30 patients; 14 males, 16 females; mean age 28 years; range 10-62 years) and temporal fascia (30 patients; 17 males, 13 females; mean age 30 years; range 12-58 years) were compared with respect to tympanic membrane healing and hearing levels. The size of perforations in the cartilage tympanoplasty group was greater than that of the temporal fascia group. Audiological assessments were performed in the postoperative third and sixth months. The follow-up period was at least six months. Tympanic membrane healing and hearing levels were statistically analyzed using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: Tympanic membrane healing rates were 80% (24 patients) and 86% (26 patients) in the temporal fascia and cartilage tympanoplasties, respectively. Postoperatively, hearing levels improved in both groups. However, no significant differences were found between the two treatment groups with respect to tympanic membrane healing and hearing levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that cartilage palisade graft can be safely used in the treatment of tympanic membrane perforations, with no adverse effects on the hearing levels in the postoperative six months.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: We compared the levels of hearing and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tympanoplasty procedures with the use of cartilage palisade (30 patients; 14 males, 16 females; mean age 28 years; range 10-62 years) and temporal fascia (30 patients; 17 males, 13 females; mean age 30 years; range 12-58 years) were compared with respect to tympanic membrane healing and hearing levels. The size of perforations in the cartilage tympanoplasty group was greater than that of the temporal fascia group. Audiological assessments were performed in the postoperative third and sixth months. The follow-up period was at least six months. Tympanic membrane healing and hearing levels were statistically analyzed using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: Tympanic membrane healing rates were 80% (24 patients) and 86% (26 patients) in the temporal fascia and cartilage tympanoplasties, respectively. Postoperatively, hearing levels improved in both groups. However, no significant differences were found between the two treatment groups with respect to tympanic membrane healing and hearing levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that cartilage palisade graft can be safely used in the treatment of tympanic membrane perforations, with no adverse effects on the hearing levels in the postoperative six months.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: We compared the levels of hearing and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tympanoplasty procedures with the use of cartilage palisade (30 patients; 14 males, 16 females; mean age 28 years; range 10-62 years) and temporal fascia (30 patients; 17 males, 13 females; mean age 30 years; range 12-58 years) were compared with respect to tympanic membrane healing and hearing levels. The size of perforations in the cartilage tympanoplasty group was greater than that of the temporal fascia group. Audiological assessments were performed in the postoperative third and sixth months. The follow-up period was at least six months. Tympanic membrane healing and hearing levels were statistically analyzed using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: Tympanic membrane healing rates were 80% (24 patients) and 86% (26 patients) in the temporal fascia and cartilage tympanoplasties, respectively. Postoperatively, hearing levels improved in both groups. However, no significant differences were found between the two treatment groups with respect to tympanic membrane healing and hearing levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that cartilage palisade graft can be safely used in the treatment of tympanic membrane perforations, with no adverse effects on the hearing levels in the postoperative six months.

Key concepts: Tympanoplasty, Medicine, Cartilage, Temporal fascia, Fascia, Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Surgery, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of hearing levels and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques: preliminary results]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens