1996PubMedRequires access

In vivo solubility of three types of luting cement.

N E Hersek, Şenay Canay

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

The in vivo solubility of glass-ionomer, zinc polycarboxylate, and zinc phosphate luting cements was compared. The specimens were inserted in the lingual flanges of the mandibular dentures of 10 edentulous patients. After 8 months, the cement specimens were removed and the amount of solubility was measured with direct techniques. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate surface topography after disintegration. The elements present in each cement were determined with energy-dispersive spectroscopy. The zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate cements demonstrated approximately equal solubility. Glass-ionomer cement exhibited significantly less solubility than did either zinc phosphate or polycarboxylate cement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The in vivo solubility of glass-ionomer, zinc polycarboxylate, and zinc phosphate luting cements was compared. The specimens were inserted in the lingual flanges of the mandibular dentures of 10 edentulous patients. After 8 months, the cement specimens were removed and the amount of solubility was measured with direct techniques. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate surface topography after disintegration. The elements present in each cement were determined with energy-dispersive spectroscopy. The zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate cements demonstrated approximately equal solubility. Glass-ionomer cement exhibited significantly less solubility than did either zinc phosphate or polycarboxylate cement.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The in vivo solubility of glass-ionomer, zinc polycarboxylate, and zinc phosphate luting cements was compared. The specimens were inserted in the lingual flanges of the mandibular dentures of 10 edentulous patients. After 8 months, the cement specimens were removed and the amount of solubility was measured with direct techniques. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate surface topography after disintegration. The elements present in each cement were determined with energy-dispersive spectroscopy. The zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate cements demonstrated approximately equal solubility. Glass-ionomer cement exhibited significantly less solubility than did either zinc phosphate or polycarboxylate cement.

Key concepts: Zinc phosphate, Solubility, Cement, Zinc, Dental cement, Glass ionomer cement, Materials science, Phosphate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In vivo solubility of three types of luting cement. — Research Paper | ScholarLens