1987CephalalgiaRequires access

Pericranial Tenderness in Tension Headache: A Blind, Controlled Study

Michael Langemark, Jes Olesen

Open publisher page 290 citations

Abstract

Forty patients with tension headache and 40 healthy comparable control persons were palpated by the same "blinded" observer. Tenderness in 10 pericranial muscles on each side was rated on a four-point scale. A Total Tenderness Score was calculated for each individual by adding the scores from all palpated areas. Headache patients had significantly higher scores than controls and also significantly higher tenderness in each point separately. Median normal values and confidence limits for tenderness are given. Among 23 patients with daily headache a correlation was found between headache intensity and Total Tenderness Score. It is likely that the pathologic tenderness in patients with tension headache is the source of nociception, but pain mechanisms are more complex, as evidenced by discrepancy between tenderness and pain in some patients. Pathologic tenderness should be a contributing criterion to the diagnosis of tension headache (muscle contraction headache).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Forty patients with tension headache and 40 healthy comparable control persons were palpated by the same "blinded" observer. Tenderness in 10 pericranial muscles on each side was rated on a four-point scale. A Total Tenderness Score was calculated for each individual by adding the scores from all palpated areas. Headache patients had significantly higher scores than controls and also significantly higher tenderness in each point separately. Median normal values and confidence limits for tenderness are given. Among 23 patients with daily headache a correlation was found between headache intensity and Total Tenderness Score. It is likely that the pathologic tenderness in patients with tension headache is the source of nociception, but pain mechanisms are more complex, as evidenced by discrepancy between tenderness and pain in some patients. Pathologic tenderness should be a contributing criterion to the diagnosis of tension headache (muscle contraction headache).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 290 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Forty patients with tension headache and 40 healthy comparable control persons were palpated by the same "blinded" observer. Tenderness in 10 pericranial muscles on each side was rated on a four-point scale. A Total Tenderness Score was calculated for each individual by adding the scores from all palpated areas. Headache patients had significantly higher scores than controls and also significantly higher tenderness in each point separately. Median normal values and confidence limits for tenderness are given. Among 23 patients with daily headache a correlation was found between headache intensity and Total Tenderness Score. It is likely that the pathologic tenderness in patients with tension headache is the source of nociception, but pain mechanisms are more complex, as evidenced by discrepancy between tenderness and pain in some patients. Pathologic tenderness should be a contributing criterion to the diagnosis of tension headache (muscle contraction headache).

Key concepts: Tenderness, Medicine, Tension headache, Physical examination, Anesthesia, Physical therapy, Surgery, Migraine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pericranial Tenderness in Tension Headache: A Blind, Controlled Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens