1996PubMedRequires access

Improved sperm recovery rate with Percoll gradient method in intrauterine insemination.

Hong-Yuan Huang, Ying-Ming Lai, Chyi‐Long Lee, Mi‐Yoon Chang, Sin-Yuen Chang, Y K Soong

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the different sperm manipulation methods on the recovery rate of motile sperm that was collected to use in the intrauterine insemination. Three hundred and thirty-five IUI (intrauterine insemination) cycle from a total of 963 treatment cycles was performed for non-peritoneal factor infertility couples. The sperm separation methods were swim-up, swim-down and Percoll gradient (since Mar. 1992). We compared the different sperm preparation methods in normal and abnormal semen analysis group. Our results show that in the abnormal semen samples (oligospermic approximately, asthenospermic approximately), the Percoll gradient method is superior to the swim-up and swim-down methods on the recovery of a higher number of total, motile and active motile spermatozoa (p < 0.05), even though the sperm quality before preparation was rather poorer than the samples prepared by the other two methods. The pregnancy rate in both groups are not statistically significant. We conclude that the Percoll gradient is an improved method for semen manipulation as it allows greater recovery of sperm with higher motility in intrauterine insemination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to compare the different sperm manipulation methods on the recovery rate of motile sperm that was collected to use in the intrauterine insemination. Three hundred and thirty-five IUI (intrauterine insemination) cycle from a total of 963 treatment cycles was performed for non-peritoneal factor infertility couples. The sperm separation methods were swim-up, swim-down and Percoll gradient (since Mar. 1992). We compared the different sperm preparation methods in normal and abnormal semen analysis group. Our results show that in the abnormal semen samples (oligospermic approximately, asthenospermic approximately), the Percoll gradient method is superior to the swim-up and swim-down methods on the recovery of a higher number of total, motile and active motile spermatozoa (p < 0.05), even though the sperm quality before preparation was rather poorer than the samples prepared by the other two methods. The pregnancy rate in both groups are not statistically significant. We conclude that the Percoll gradient is an improved method for semen manipulation as it allows greater recovery of sperm with higher motility in intrauterine insemination.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the different sperm manipulation methods on the recovery rate of motile sperm that was collected to use in the intrauterine insemination. Three hundred and thirty-five IUI (intrauterine insemination) cycle from a total of 963 treatment cycles was performed for non-peritoneal factor infertility couples. The sperm separation methods were swim-up, swim-down and Percoll gradient (since Mar. 1992). We compared the different sperm preparation methods in normal and abnormal semen analysis group. Our results show that in the abnormal semen samples (oligospermic approximately, asthenospermic approximately), the Percoll gradient method is superior to the swim-up and swim-down methods on the recovery of a higher number of total, motile and active motile spermatozoa (p < 0.05), even though the sperm quality before preparation was rather poorer than the samples prepared by the other two methods. The pregnancy rate in both groups are not statistically significant. We conclude that the Percoll gradient is an improved method for semen manipulation as it allows greater recovery of sperm with higher motility in intrauterine insemination.

Key concepts: Percoll, Sperm, Sperm washing, Intrauterine insemination, Semen, Andrology, Artificial insemination, Insemination

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improved sperm recovery rate with Percoll gradient method in intrauterine insemination. — Research Paper | ScholarLens