SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE THEORY OF THE "LIQUIDITY TRAP"
Alfonso Palacio‐Vera
Abstract
Open-access reader
Alfonso Palacio‐Vera
Abstract
Open-access reader
We provide a formal definition of the “liquidity trap” (LT) according to which, a LT arises if a combination of high precautionary saving, low investment and stringent conditions for access to bank credit stemming from a high degree of liquidity preference make the sum of the “neutral” interest rate and the expected inflation rate fall short of the term/risk premium on long-term interest rates. We then compare the “New Consensus” (NC) in macroeconomics as expounded in Woodford (2003) and the Post-Keynesian (PK) approach regarding the causes of a LT. We argue that in the NC approach a LT is a phenomenon caused by unusually large transitory shocks that depress the “neutral” interest rate temporarily. By contrast, we argue that in the PK approach an economy may also exhibit a “structural” or long-lasting LT even in the absence of large adverse shocks. Finally, we discuss a number of theoretical issues recently raised in the rapidly growing literature on the LT.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We provide a formal definition of the “liquidity trap” (LT) according to which, a LT arises if a combination of high precautionary saving, low investment and stringent conditions for access to bank credit stemming from a high degree of liquidity preference make the sum of the “neutral” interest rate and the expected inflation rate fall short of the term/risk premium on long-term interest rates. We then compare the “New Consensus” (NC) in macroeconomics as expounded in Woodford (2003) and the Post-Keynesian (PK) approach regarding the causes of a LT. We argue that in the NC approach a LT is a phenomenon caused by unusually large transitory shocks that depress the “neutral” interest rate temporarily. By contrast, we argue that in the PK approach an economy may also exhibit a “structural” or long-lasting LT even in the absence of large adverse shocks. Finally, we discuss a number of theoretical issues recently raised in the rapidly growing literature on the LT.
Key concepts: Liquidity trap, Economics, Liquidity preference, Interest rate, New Keynesian economics, Inflation (cosmology), Monetary economics, Market liquidity