2011Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Legal Method

James R. Maxeiner, Gyooho Lee, Armin Weber, Philip K. Howard

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Before we discuss our lawsuit in three systems, we address basic legal methods. What we say may seem obvious, but our experience suggests that that which is obvious in one legal system may not be in another. We consider what it means to “think like a lawyer” and we look at “sources of law,” that is, principally statutes and court decisions. Deciding according to law requires determining applicable rules, finding facts, and applying rules to facts. This is considerably more difficult than is generally supposed. The legal rule cannot always be read from a single statute or precedent. It often is necessary to search statutes and precedents, analyze them, compare them to facts, revisit statutes and precedents in light of the facts, and again examine facts in light of the law. The end result is to bring facts and law together.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Before we discuss our lawsuit in three systems, we address basic legal methods. What we say may seem obvious, but our experience suggests that that which is obvious in one legal system may not be in another. We consider what it means to “think like a lawyer” and we look at “sources of law,” that is, principally statutes and court decisions. Deciding according to law requires determining applicable rules, finding facts, and applying rules to facts. This is considerably more difficult than is generally supposed. The legal rule cannot always be read from a single statute or precedent. It often is necessary to search statutes and precedents, analyze them, compare them to facts, revisit statutes and precedents in light of the facts, and again examine facts in light of the law. The end result is to bring facts and law together.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Before we discuss our lawsuit in three systems, we address basic legal methods. What we say may seem obvious, but our experience suggests that that which is obvious in one legal system may not be in another. We consider what it means to “think like a lawyer” and we look at “sources of law,” that is, principally statutes and court decisions. Deciding according to law requires determining applicable rules, finding facts, and applying rules to facts. This is considerably more difficult than is generally supposed. The legal rule cannot always be read from a single statute or precedent. It often is necessary to search statutes and precedents, analyze them, compare them to facts, revisit statutes and precedents in light of the facts, and again examine facts in light of the law. The end result is to bring facts and law together.

Key concepts: Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Legal Method — Research Paper | ScholarLens