1987PubMedRequires access

Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters.

Randall S. Brenton, William A. Argus

Open publisher page 44 citations

Abstract

Fluctuation of threshold determinations must be considered when evaluating visual field abnormalities. The short- and long-term threshold fluctuation were measured on 36 normal subjects using the Octopus and Humphrey automated perimeters. Subjects were tested using similar threshold programs that tested 16 locations twice. Short-term fluctuation was greater on the Octopus perimeter (1.6 +/- 0.3 dB) than on the Humphrey perimeter (1.3 +/- 0.3 dB; P less than 0.001). The heterogenous long-term fluctuation was greater on the Octopus perimeter (1.6 +/- 0.4 dB) than on the Humphrey perimeter (1.3 +/- 0.5 dB; P less than 0.05). The homogenous long-term fluctuation was near 0 for both machines. There are numerous variables that can alter the reproducibility of perimetry. Reproducibility can be estimated by short- and long-term fluctuation, but differences between the Octopus and Humphrey also influence their fluctuation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fluctuation of threshold determinations must be considered when evaluating visual field abnormalities. The short- and long-term threshold fluctuation were measured on 36 normal subjects using the Octopus and Humphrey automated perimeters. Subjects were tested using similar threshold programs that tested 16 locations twice. Short-term fluctuation was greater on the Octopus perimeter (1.6 +/- 0.3 dB) than on the Humphrey perimeter (1.3 +/- 0.3 dB; P less than 0.001). The heterogenous long-term fluctuation was greater on the Octopus perimeter (1.6 +/- 0.4 dB) than on the Humphrey perimeter (1.3 +/- 0.5 dB; P less than 0.05). The homogenous long-term fluctuation was near 0 for both machines. There are numerous variables that can alter the reproducibility of perimetry. Reproducibility can be estimated by short- and long-term fluctuation, but differences between the Octopus and Humphrey also influence their fluctuation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fluctuation of threshold determinations must be considered when evaluating visual field abnormalities. The short- and long-term threshold fluctuation were measured on 36 normal subjects using the Octopus and Humphrey automated perimeters. Subjects were tested using similar threshold programs that tested 16 locations twice. Short-term fluctuation was greater on the Octopus perimeter (1.6 +/- 0.3 dB) than on the Humphrey perimeter (1.3 +/- 0.3 dB; P less than 0.001). The heterogenous long-term fluctuation was greater on the Octopus perimeter (1.6 +/- 0.4 dB) than on the Humphrey perimeter (1.3 +/- 0.5 dB; P less than 0.05). The homogenous long-term fluctuation was near 0 for both machines. There are numerous variables that can alter the reproducibility of perimetry. Reproducibility can be estimated by short- and long-term fluctuation, but differences between the Octopus and Humphrey also influence their fluctuation.

Key concepts: octopus (software), Perimeter, Reproducibility, Term (time), Mathematics, Visual field, Physics, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters. — Research Paper | ScholarLens