2004•Unpublished venueRequires access

Evolution of Maritime Strategy...Is Sea Power the Answer?

Stephen M. Benner

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Alfred Thayer Mahan is credited with convincing the United States Government that maritime power could be used to achieve strategic goals and attain major power status. Mahan's concepts have continued to shape United States maritime strategy albeit to a varying degree since they were first accepted. Maritime strategy has played a key role in the political framework of the United States as the nation evolved from a coastal to an oceanic to a trans-oceanic power. This paper provides a definition of maritime strategy and briefly analyzes modern American maritime strategies based on the concepts provided by Alfred Thayer Mahan with emphasis on the vision presented in Sea Power 21. The United States Navy enjoys a position of unrivaled maritime dominance in the post-Cold War world and the basis for developing national strategy has shifted from a potential threat to maintaining specified military capabilities. This changed focus complicates the process of defining the means requisite to a maritime strategy and opens the question does Sea Power 21 adequately rationalize the ends ways and means required for an effective maritime strategy?

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Alfred Thayer Mahan is credited with convincing the United States Government that maritime power could be used to achieve strategic goals and attain major power status. Mahan's concepts have continued to shape United States maritime strategy albeit to a varying degree since they were first accepted. Maritime strategy has played a key role in the political framework of the United States as the nation evolved from a coastal to an oceanic to a trans-oceanic power. This paper provides a definition of maritime strategy and briefly analyzes modern American maritime strategies based on the concepts provided by Alfred Thayer Mahan with emphasis on the vision presented in Sea Power 21. The United States Navy enjoys a position of unrivaled maritime dominance in the post-Cold War world and the basis for developing national strategy has shifted from a potential threat to maintaining specified military capabilities. This changed focus complicates the process of defining the means requisite to a maritime strategy and opens the question does Sea Power 21 adequately rationalize the ends ways and means required for an effective maritime strategy?

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Alfred Thayer Mahan is credited with convincing the United States Government that maritime power could be used to achieve strategic goals and attain major power status. Mahan's concepts have continued to shape United States maritime strategy albeit to a varying degree since they were first accepted. Maritime strategy has played a key role in the political framework of the United States as the nation evolved from a coastal to an oceanic to a trans-oceanic power. This paper provides a definition of maritime strategy and briefly analyzes modern American maritime strategies based on the concepts provided by Alfred Thayer Mahan with emphasis on the vision presented in Sea Power 21. The United States Navy enjoys a position of unrivaled maritime dominance in the post-Cold War world and the basis for developing national strategy has shifted from a potential threat to maintaining specified military capabilities. This changed focus complicates the process of defining the means requisite to a maritime strategy and opens the question does Sea Power 21 adequately rationalize the ends ways and means required for an effective maritime strategy?

Key concepts: Oceanography, Power (physics), Geography, Geology, Physics, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evolution of Maritime Strategy...Is Sea Power the Answer? — Research Paper | ScholarLens