2000•European Journal of BiochemistryOpen access

Carotenoid binding sites in LHCIIb

Stephan Hobe, Hildrun Niemeier, Alexander Bender, Harald Paulsen

Open full text 91 citations

Abstract

The major light-harvesting complex of photosystem II can be reconstituted in vitro from its bacterially expressed apoprotein with chlorophylls a and b and neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, or zeaxanthin as the only xanthophyll. Reconstitution of these one-carotenoid complexes requires low-stringency conditions during complex formation and isolation. Neoxanthin complexes (containing 30-50% of the all-trans isomer) disintegrate during electrophoresis, exhibit a largely reduced resistance against proteolytic attack; in addition, energy transfer from Chl b to Chl a is easily disrupted at elevated temperature. Complexes reconstituted in the presence of either zeaxanthin or lutein contain nearly two xanthophylls per 12 chlorophylls and are more resistant against trypsin. Lutein-LHCIIb also exhibits an intermediate maintenance of energy transfer at higher temperature. Violaxanthin complexes approach a xanthophyll/12 chlorophyll ratio of 3, similar to the ratio in recombinant LHCIIb containing all xanthophylls. On the other hand, violaxanthin-LHCIIb exhibits a low thermal stability like neoxanthin complexes, but an intermediate accessibility towards trypsin, similar to lutein-LHCIIb and zeaxanthin-LHCIIb. Binary competition experiments were performed with two xanthophylls at varying ratios in the reconstitution. Analysis of the xanthophyll contents in the reconstitution products yielded information about relative carotenoid affinities of three assumed binding sites. In lutein/neoxanthin competition experiments, two binding sites showed a strong preference (> 200-fold) for lutein, whereas the third binding site had a higher affinity (25-fold) to neoxanthin. Competition between lutein and violaxanthin gave a similar result, although the specificities were lower: two binding sites have a 36-fold preference for lutein and one has a fivefold preference for violaxanthin. The lowest selectivity was between lutein and zeaxanthin: two binding sites had a fivefold higher affinity for lutein and one has a threefold higher affinity to zeaxanthin.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The major light-harvesting complex of photosystem II can be reconstituted in vitro from its bacterially expressed apoprotein with chlorophylls a and b and neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, or zeaxanthin as the only xanthophyll. Reconstitution of these one-carotenoid complexes requires low-stringency conditions during complex formation and isolation. Neoxanthin complexes (containing 30-50% of the all-trans isomer) disintegrate during electrophoresis, exhibit a largely reduced resistance against proteolytic attack; in addition, energy transfer from Chl b to Chl a is easily disrupted at elevated temperature. Complexes reconstituted in the presence of either zeaxanthin or lutein contain nearly two xanthophylls per 12 chlorophylls and are more resistant against trypsin. Lutein-LHCIIb also exhibits an intermediate maintenance of energy transfer at higher temperature. Violaxanthin complexes approach a xanthophyll/12 chlorophyll ratio of 3, similar to the ratio in recombinant LHCIIb containing all xanthophylls. On the other hand, violaxanthin-LHCIIb exhibits a low thermal stability like neoxanthin complexes, but an intermediate accessibility towards trypsin, similar to lutein-LHCIIb and zeaxanthin-LHCIIb. Binary competition experiments were performed with two xanthophylls at varying ratios in the reconstitution. Analysis of the xanthophyll contents in the reconstitution products yielded information about relative carotenoid affinities of three assumed binding sites. In lutein/neoxanthin competition experiments, two binding sites showed a strong preference (> 200-fold) for lutein, whereas the third binding site had a higher affinity (25-fold) to neoxanthin. Competition between lutein and violaxanthin gave a similar result, although the specificities were lower: two binding sites have a 36-fold preference for lutein and one has a fivefold preference for violaxanthin. The lowest selectivity was between lutein and zeaxanthin: two binding sites had a fivefold higher affinity for lutein and one has a threefold higher affinity to zeaxanthin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 91 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The major light-harvesting complex of photosystem II can be reconstituted in vitro from its bacterially expressed apoprotein with chlorophylls a and b and neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, or zeaxanthin as the only xanthophyll. Reconstitution of these one-carotenoid complexes requires low-stringency conditions during complex formation and isolation. Neoxanthin complexes (containing 30-50% of the all-trans isomer) disintegrate during electrophoresis, exhibit a largely reduced resistance against proteolytic attack; in addition, energy transfer from Chl b to Chl a is easily disrupted at elevated temperature. Complexes reconstituted in the presence of either zeaxanthin or lutein contain nearly two xanthophylls per 12 chlorophylls and are more resistant against trypsin. Lutein-LHCIIb also exhibits an intermediate maintenance of energy transfer at higher temperature. Violaxanthin complexes approach a xanthophyll/12 chlorophyll ratio of 3, similar to the ratio in recombinant LHCIIb containing all xanthophylls. On the other hand, violaxanthin-LHCIIb exhibits a low thermal stability like neoxanthin complexes, but an intermediate accessibility towards trypsin, similar to lutein-LHCIIb and zeaxanthin-LHCIIb. Binary competition experiments were performed with two xanthophylls at varying ratios in the reconstitution. Analysis of the xanthophyll contents in the reconstitution products yielded information about relative carotenoid affinities of three assumed binding sites. In lutein/neoxanthin competition experiments, two binding sites showed a strong preference (> 200-fold) for lutein, whereas the third binding site had a higher affinity (25-fold) to neoxanthin. Competition between lutein and violaxanthin gave a similar result, although the specificities were lower: two binding sites have a 36-fold preference for lutein and one has a fivefold preference for violaxanthin. The lowest selectivity was between lutein and zeaxanthin: two binding sites had a fivefold higher affinity for lutein and one has a threefold higher affinity to zeaxanthin.

Key concepts: Neoxanthin, Xanthophyll, Violaxanthin, Lutein, Zeaxanthin, Biology, Biochemistry, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Carotenoid binding sites in LHCIIb — Research Paper | ScholarLens