1989•PubMedRequires access

[Quantitative evaluation of perspiration with equipment for continuous recording of local perspiration volume (II): Hyperhidrosis and hypohidrosis (or anhidrosis)].

K Kanno, T Yoshiike

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

To objectively evaluate perspiration volume, we tried to measure the perspiration volume from 6 cases of hyperhidrosis and 4 cases of hypo-(or an-) hidrosis using recently developed equipment for continuous recording of local perspiration volume. Patients with hyperhidrosis were loaded with various factors to possibly influence the perspiration volume, and the effects were compared. The results revealed: 1) The measurement of local perspiration volume with this equipment provides objective data useful for the diagnosis of hyperhidrosis and hypo-(or an-) hidrosis and for the judgement of its grade; 2) in case of palmar hyperhidrosis, mental stimuli most strongly induced perspiration; and 3) the responses to mental arithmetic or hand grasping and the base-line stable time are reliable parameters for measurement of perspiration volume.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To objectively evaluate perspiration volume, we tried to measure the perspiration volume from 6 cases of hyperhidrosis and 4 cases of hypo-(or an-) hidrosis using recently developed equipment for continuous recording of local perspiration volume. Patients with hyperhidrosis were loaded with various factors to possibly influence the perspiration volume, and the effects were compared. The results revealed: 1) The measurement of local perspiration volume with this equipment provides objective data useful for the diagnosis of hyperhidrosis and hypo-(or an-) hidrosis and for the judgement of its grade; 2) in case of palmar hyperhidrosis, mental stimuli most strongly induced perspiration; and 3) the responses to mental arithmetic or hand grasping and the base-line stable time are reliable parameters for measurement of perspiration volume.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To objectively evaluate perspiration volume, we tried to measure the perspiration volume from 6 cases of hyperhidrosis and 4 cases of hypo-(or an-) hidrosis using recently developed equipment for continuous recording of local perspiration volume. Patients with hyperhidrosis were loaded with various factors to possibly influence the perspiration volume, and the effects were compared. The results revealed: 1) The measurement of local perspiration volume with this equipment provides objective data useful for the diagnosis of hyperhidrosis and hypo-(or an-) hidrosis and for the judgement of its grade; 2) in case of palmar hyperhidrosis, mental stimuli most strongly induced perspiration; and 3) the responses to mental arithmetic or hand grasping and the base-line stable time are reliable parameters for measurement of perspiration volume.

Key concepts: Perspiration, Hyperhidrosis, Anhidrosis, Medicine, Volume (thermodynamics), SWEAT, Dermatology, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Quantitative evaluation of perspiration with equipment for continuous recording of local perspiration volume (II): Hyperhidrosis and hypohidrosis (or anhidrosis)]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens