ScholarLens Back to search
1996•Acta CytologicaRequires access

Imprint Cytology

Smaragda Veneti, Lydia Ioannidou-Mouzaka, Helen Toufexi, John Xenitides, P Anastasiadis

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare imprint cytology with fine needle aspiration biopsy and histology for the intraoperative diagnosis of breast malignancy. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated imprint cytology, comparing it with other diagnostic techniques. Three hundred fifty-one cases (180 benign and 171 malignant) were studied by fine needle aspiration cytology, imprint cytology and histopathology. RESULTS: Imprint cytology, as compared to histopathology, had 98.3% accuracy, with 97.1% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity. Aspiration cytology was less accurate than imprint cytology as compared to histopathology (accuracy 94.9%, sensitivity 93.9%, specificity 96.2%). CONCLUSION: These data confirm the value of imprint cytology and suggest that it could be used intraoperatively as an alternative to frozen section if a pathology laboratory is not available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare imprint cytology with fine needle aspiration biopsy and histology for the intraoperative diagnosis of breast malignancy. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated imprint cytology, comparing it with other diagnostic techniques. Three hundred fifty-one cases (180 benign and 171 malignant) were studied by fine needle aspiration cytology, imprint cytology and histopathology. RESULTS: Imprint cytology, as compared to histopathology, had 98.3% accuracy, with 97.1% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity. Aspiration cytology was less accurate than imprint cytology as compared to histopathology (accuracy 94.9%, sensitivity 93.9%, specificity 96.2%). CONCLUSION: These data confirm the value of imprint cytology and suggest that it could be used intraoperatively as an alternative to frozen section if a pathology laboratory is not available.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare imprint cytology with fine needle aspiration biopsy and histology for the intraoperative diagnosis of breast malignancy. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated imprint cytology, comparing it with other diagnostic techniques. Three hundred fifty-one cases (180 benign and 171 malignant) were studied by fine needle aspiration cytology, imprint cytology and histopathology. RESULTS: Imprint cytology, as compared to histopathology, had 98.3% accuracy, with 97.1% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity. Aspiration cytology was less accurate than imprint cytology as compared to histopathology (accuracy 94.9%, sensitivity 93.9%, specificity 96.2%). CONCLUSION: These data confirm the value of imprint cytology and suggest that it could be used intraoperatively as an alternative to frozen section if a pathology laboratory is not available.

Key concepts: Cytology, Histopathology, Medicine, Malignancy, Biopsy, Fine needle aspiration cytology, Histology, Cytopathology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Imprint Cytology — Research Paper | ScholarLens