2015PubMedRequires access

[Second primary malignancies after the treatment of multiple myeloma].

Shinichi Makita, Dai Maruyama

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Outcome of the patients with multiple myeloma has improved significantly in the last decade, mainly because of the introduction of new agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. Improvements in survival among patients with multiple myeloma suggest that the incidence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) may increase in the future. Many factors could affect increasing the risk of SPMs, such as treatment factors, myeloma related factors, host genetic factors, and so on. Especially, previous clinical trials suggested that extended exposure to the melphalan and lenalidomide containing regimens are the important risk factors of SPMs. Although numbers of SPMs are small, for individual patients who develop SPMs, the outcomes are devastating. Therefore, we need to discuss not only the efficacy but also the risks of SPMs associated with the treatment in the patients with multiple myeloma in new agents era.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Outcome of the patients with multiple myeloma has improved significantly in the last decade, mainly because of the introduction of new agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. Improvements in survival among patients with multiple myeloma suggest that the incidence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) may increase in the future. Many factors could affect increasing the risk of SPMs, such as treatment factors, myeloma related factors, host genetic factors, and so on. Especially, previous clinical trials suggested that extended exposure to the melphalan and lenalidomide containing regimens are the important risk factors of SPMs. Although numbers of SPMs are small, for individual patients who develop SPMs, the outcomes are devastating. Therefore, we need to discuss not only the efficacy but also the risks of SPMs associated with the treatment in the patients with multiple myeloma in new agents era.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Outcome of the patients with multiple myeloma has improved significantly in the last decade, mainly because of the introduction of new agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. Improvements in survival among patients with multiple myeloma suggest that the incidence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) may increase in the future. Many factors could affect increasing the risk of SPMs, such as treatment factors, myeloma related factors, host genetic factors, and so on. Especially, previous clinical trials suggested that extended exposure to the melphalan and lenalidomide containing regimens are the important risk factors of SPMs. Although numbers of SPMs are small, for individual patients who develop SPMs, the outcomes are devastating. Therefore, we need to discuss not only the efficacy but also the risks of SPMs associated with the treatment in the patients with multiple myeloma in new agents era.

Key concepts: Lenalidomide, Multiple myeloma, Thalidomide, Medicine, Melphalan, Bortezomib, Oncology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Second primary malignancies after the treatment of multiple myeloma]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens