1991OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Technical feasibility and cost of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) NO sub x control

C.P. Robie

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Investigators conducted an engineering study to evaluate selective catalytic reduction (SCR) capital and operating costs and identify possible barriers to application. Next, they developed SCR designs for six hypothetical power plants, with fuel composition, furnace design, and plant layout reflecting US applications. Third, they prepared and submitted to a major commercial SCR supplier the performance specifications for NO{sub x} removal and control of residual ammonia (NH{sub 3}) and sulfur (SO{sub 3}). The supplier responded with process designs and cost estimates for each study case. Design cases included new plants and retrofits, high- and low-sulfur coal, high-sulfur oil, pulverized coal and cyclone-fired boilers, and two common options for reactor placement -- (1) hot side between the economizer and air heater, and (2) cold side behind the flue gas desulfurization unit. Finally, investigators costed the remaining plant equipment needed to integrate the SCR process with the plant. 135 figs., 48 tabs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Investigators conducted an engineering study to evaluate selective catalytic reduction (SCR) capital and operating costs and identify possible barriers to application. Next, they developed SCR designs for six hypothetical power plants, with fuel composition, furnace design, and plant layout reflecting US applications. Third, they prepared and submitted to a major commercial SCR supplier the performance specifications for NO{sub x} removal and control of residual ammonia (NH{sub 3}) and sulfur (SO{sub 3}). The supplier responded with process designs and cost estimates for each study case. Design cases included new plants and retrofits, high- and low-sulfur coal, high-sulfur oil, pulverized coal and cyclone-fired boilers, and two common options for reactor placement -- (1) hot side between the economizer and air heater, and (2) cold side behind the flue gas desulfurization unit. Finally, investigators costed the remaining plant equipment needed to integrate the SCR process with the plant. 135 figs., 48 tabs.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Investigators conducted an engineering study to evaluate selective catalytic reduction (SCR) capital and operating costs and identify possible barriers to application. Next, they developed SCR designs for six hypothetical power plants, with fuel composition, furnace design, and plant layout reflecting US applications. Third, they prepared and submitted to a major commercial SCR supplier the performance specifications for NO{sub x} removal and control of residual ammonia (NH{sub 3}) and sulfur (SO{sub 3}). The supplier responded with process designs and cost estimates for each study case. Design cases included new plants and retrofits, high- and low-sulfur coal, high-sulfur oil, pulverized coal and cyclone-fired boilers, and two common options for reactor placement -- (1) hot side between the economizer and air heater, and (2) cold side behind the flue gas desulfurization unit. Finally, investigators costed the remaining plant equipment needed to integrate the SCR process with the plant. 135 figs., 48 tabs.

Key concepts: Flue gas, Selective catalytic reduction, Waste management, Engineering, Power station, Capital cost, Flue-gas desulfurization, Process engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Technical feasibility and cost of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) NO sub x control — Research Paper | ScholarLens