2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Phthalides, instead of ferulic acid and tetramethylpyrazine, are the appropriate bioactive chemical markers for the quality assessment and pharmacological evaluation of Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong.

Chan SunKin, Yan Jiang, Zhihong Jiang, Ge Lin, V. K. Singh, J. N. Govil

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong are two of the most widely prescribed traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for treating cardiovascular disorders in China. The therapeutic effects of these two herbs are generally considered as the contribution of their respective constituent ferulic acid and tetramethylpyrazine. Nonetheless, both constituents are of minuscule quantities and ferulic acid is a widespread constituent among numerous botanicals. Phthalides, on the other hand, are the most abundant group of compounds identified in Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong and their biological actions correlate to the clinical activities of both herbs. In the current article, we argue the appropriateness of employing ferulic acid and tetramethylpyrazine as the respective bioactive chemical markers of Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong, and propose that phthalides are a more suitable alternative.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong are two of the most widely prescribed traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for treating cardiovascular disorders in China. The therapeutic effects of these two herbs are generally considered as the contribution of their respective constituent ferulic acid and tetramethylpyrazine. Nonetheless, both constituents are of minuscule quantities and ferulic acid is a widespread constituent among numerous botanicals. Phthalides, on the other hand, are the most abundant group of compounds identified in Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong and their biological actions correlate to the clinical activities of both herbs. In the current article, we argue the appropriateness of employing ferulic acid and tetramethylpyrazine as the respective bioactive chemical markers of Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong, and propose that phthalides are a more suitable alternative.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong are two of the most widely prescribed traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for treating cardiovascular disorders in China. The therapeutic effects of these two herbs are generally considered as the contribution of their respective constituent ferulic acid and tetramethylpyrazine. Nonetheless, both constituents are of minuscule quantities and ferulic acid is a widespread constituent among numerous botanicals. Phthalides, on the other hand, are the most abundant group of compounds identified in Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong and their biological actions correlate to the clinical activities of both herbs. In the current article, we argue the appropriateness of employing ferulic acid and tetramethylpyrazine as the respective bioactive chemical markers of Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong, and propose that phthalides are a more suitable alternative.

Key concepts: Angelica sinensis, Ferulic acid, Tetramethylpyrazine, Traditional medicine, Chemistry, Pharmacognosy, Medicine, Biological activity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phthalides, instead of ferulic acid and tetramethylpyrazine, are the appropriate bioactive chemical markers for the quality assessment and pharmacological evaluation of Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong. — Research Paper | ScholarLens