1989PubMedRequires access

Captopril versus perindopril: a double blind study in essential hypertension.

Kennedy R. Lees, John L. Reid, M G Scott, J Hosie, D Herpin, J P Santoni

Open publisher page 44 citations

Abstract

This was a double blind, parallel group, multicentre comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and acceptability of perindopril and captopril in essential hypertension. After one month of placebo, 165 patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 125 mmHg were randomised to perindopril 4 mg once daily or captopril 25 mg twice daily orally. The perindopril group (n = 82) had significantly higher pretreatment DBP (105.4 +/- 0.8 mmHg vs 102.3 +/- 0.6 mmHg) but other demographic variables were similar. Assessment was monthly for three months: 'uncontrolled' patients (DBP greater than 90 mmHg) had the dose doubled and then hydrochlorothiazide added. Two of the six withdrawals were attributed to drug side effects and were in the captopril group. There was no significant difference in the number of withdrawals or incidence of side effects between the drugs. The final titrated treatments were similar and monotherapy normalised DBP in 49% of each group. The final 'control' rate was higher with perindopril than captopril: 75% vs 57%, P = 0.016. The overall fall in DBP was greater in the perindopril group: 26.5 +/- 1.9 mmHg vs 18.9 +/- 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.005. The doses of diuretic were similar in the two groups. The DBP of patients who received only monotherapy for three months also fell more in the perindopril group (-17.5 +/- 1.4 mmHg vs -13.9 +/- 1.0 mmHg, P less than 0.01). At the doses studied, perindopril was more effective than captopril in lowering DBP, either as monotherapy or in combination with a diuretic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This was a double blind, parallel group, multicentre comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and acceptability of perindopril and captopril in essential hypertension. After one month of placebo, 165 patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 125 mmHg were randomised to perindopril 4 mg once daily or captopril 25 mg twice daily orally. The perindopril group (n = 82) had significantly higher pretreatment DBP (105.4 +/- 0.8 mmHg vs 102.3 +/- 0.6 mmHg) but other demographic variables were similar. Assessment was monthly for three months: 'uncontrolled' patients (DBP greater than 90 mmHg) had the dose doubled and then hydrochlorothiazide added. Two of the six withdrawals were attributed to drug side effects and were in the captopril group. There was no significant difference in the number of withdrawals or incidence of side effects between the drugs. The final titrated treatments were similar and monotherapy normalised DBP in 49% of each group. The final 'control' rate was higher with perindopril than captopril: 75% vs 57%, P = 0.016. The overall fall in DBP was greater in the perindopril group: 26.5 +/- 1.9 mmHg vs 18.9 +/- 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.005. The doses of diuretic were similar in the two groups. The DBP of patients who received only monotherapy for three months also fell more in the perindopril group (-17.5 +/- 1.4 mmHg vs -13.9 +/- 1.0 mmHg, P less than 0.01). At the doses studied, perindopril was more effective than captopril in lowering DBP, either as monotherapy or in combination with a diuretic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This was a double blind, parallel group, multicentre comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and acceptability of perindopril and captopril in essential hypertension. After one month of placebo, 165 patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 125 mmHg were randomised to perindopril 4 mg once daily or captopril 25 mg twice daily orally. The perindopril group (n = 82) had significantly higher pretreatment DBP (105.4 +/- 0.8 mmHg vs 102.3 +/- 0.6 mmHg) but other demographic variables were similar. Assessment was monthly for three months: 'uncontrolled' patients (DBP greater than 90 mmHg) had the dose doubled and then hydrochlorothiazide added. Two of the six withdrawals were attributed to drug side effects and were in the captopril group. There was no significant difference in the number of withdrawals or incidence of side effects between the drugs. The final titrated treatments were similar and monotherapy normalised DBP in 49% of each group. The final 'control' rate was higher with perindopril than captopril: 75% vs 57%, P = 0.016. The overall fall in DBP was greater in the perindopril group: 26.5 +/- 1.9 mmHg vs 18.9 +/- 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.005. The doses of diuretic were similar in the two groups. The DBP of patients who received only monotherapy for three months also fell more in the perindopril group (-17.5 +/- 1.4 mmHg vs -13.9 +/- 1.0 mmHg, P less than 0.01). At the doses studied, perindopril was more effective than captopril in lowering DBP, either as monotherapy or in combination with a diuretic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Key concepts: Captopril, Perindopril, Medicine, Hydrochlorothiazide, Supine position, Blood pressure, Diuretic, Essential hypertension

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source