2005Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)Open access

Objective values and moral relativism

Hoayoung Youn

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

My basic question in this dissertation is whether we can talk about practical moral truth without relying on objective (or transcendent) moral values. Recently some moral philosophers in Britain claim that such objective values are not needed for the discussion of moral truth. The philosophers present different theoretical frames to ground their point and to describe moral phenomena. According to them, it is possible that practical moral standards or values need not be based on the objective (or transcendent) moral values. In this dissertation, I look into three kinds of theories: John Mackie’s skepticism, Simon Blackburn’s antirealism, and the sensibility theory proposed by David Wiggins and John McDowell. Each theory is analyzed and criticized during the first three chapters. In the final chapter, I discuss their common problems, and propose that the notion of objective moral values (or transcendent moral standards) can cure their problems.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

My basic question in this dissertation is whether we can talk about practical moral truth without relying on objective (or transcendent) moral values. Recently some moral philosophers in Britain claim that such objective values are not needed for the discussion of moral truth. The philosophers present different theoretical frames to ground their point and to describe moral phenomena. According to them, it is possible that practical moral standards or values need not be based on the objective (or transcendent) moral values. In this dissertation, I look into three kinds of theories: John Mackie’s skepticism, Simon Blackburn’s antirealism, and the sensibility theory proposed by David Wiggins and John McDowell. Each theory is analyzed and criticized during the first three chapters. In the final chapter, I discuss their common problems, and propose that the notion of objective moral values (or transcendent moral standards) can cure their problems.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

My basic question in this dissertation is whether we can talk about practical moral truth without relying on objective (or transcendent) moral values. Recently some moral philosophers in Britain claim that such objective values are not needed for the discussion of moral truth. The philosophers present different theoretical frames to ground their point and to describe moral phenomena. According to them, it is possible that practical moral standards or values need not be based on the objective (or transcendent) moral values. In this dissertation, I look into three kinds of theories: John Mackie’s skepticism, Simon Blackburn’s antirealism, and the sensibility theory proposed by David Wiggins and John McDowell. Each theory is analyzed and criticized during the first three chapters. In the final chapter, I discuss their common problems, and propose that the notion of objective moral values (or transcendent moral standards) can cure their problems.

Key concepts: Relativism, Moral relativism, Epistemology, Philosophy, Environmental ethics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Objective values and moral relativism — Research Paper | ScholarLens