Applying parametric models for survival analysis of gastric cancer
Abdolreza Rajaeefard, B Moghimi Dehkordi, Hamid Reza Tabatabaee, Bahram Zeighami, Azadeh Safaee, Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi, Sayed Ziyaaddin Tabeie
Abstract
Abdolreza Rajaeefard, B Moghimi Dehkordi, Hamid Reza Tabatabaee, Bahram Zeighami, Azadeh Safaee, Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi, Sayed Ziyaaddin Tabeie
Abstract
Background: Cox Proportional Hazard model is the most popular tool to analyze the effects of covariates on survival time, although under certain circumstances parametric models may offer advantages over Cox model. In this study using Cox regression and alternative parametric models (such as Weibull, Exponential and Lognormal models) the prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients with gastric cancer were evaluated and comparisons for finding the best model were made. Materials and Methods: To determine the independent prognostic factors reducing survival time for gastric cancer, we compared the parametric and semi-parametric methods applied to patients registered in one cancer registry center in the southern part of Iran. Using Akaike Information Criterion, we compared parametric and Semi-parametric models. Results : Two-hundred sixty six (60.2 %) out of 442 patients died during the period. Data analysis results using Cox and Parametric models are nearly similar. According to Akaike Information Criterion, Weibull (AIC=848) and Exponential (AIC=850) models had the best fitness for survival analysis. Patients (ages 60-75 and above) at time of diagnosis had an increased risk of death followed by those with poor differentiated grade and the distant metastasis (P Conclusion: Although the Hazard Ratio in Cox and parametric models are not completely similar, according to Akaike Information Criterion, Weibull and Exponential models are the most favorable ones for survival analysis.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background: Cox Proportional Hazard model is the most popular tool to analyze the effects of covariates on survival time, although under certain circumstances parametric models may offer advantages over Cox model. In this study using Cox regression and alternative parametric models (such as Weibull, Exponential and Lognormal models) the prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients with gastric cancer were evaluated and comparisons for finding the best model were made. Materials and Methods: To determine the independent prognostic factors reducing survival time for gastric cancer, we compared the parametric and semi-parametric methods applied to patients registered in one cancer registry center in the southern part of Iran. Using Akaike Information Criterion, we compared parametric and Semi-parametric models. Results : Two-hundred sixty six (60.2 %) out of 442 patients died during the period. Data analysis results using Cox and Parametric models are nearly similar. According to Akaike Information Criterion, Weibull (AIC=848) and Exponential (AIC=850) models had the best fitness for survival analysis. Patients (ages 60-75 and above) at time of diagnosis had an increased risk of death followed by those with poor differentiated grade and the distant metastasis (P Conclusion: Although the Hazard Ratio in Cox and parametric models are not completely similar, according to Akaike Information Criterion, Weibull and Exponential models are the most favorable ones for survival analysis.
Key concepts: Akaike information criterion, Weibull distribution, Proportional hazards model, Parametric statistics, Survival analysis, Statistics, Accelerated failure time model, Parametric model