Antitrust Policy and Industrial Policy: A View from the U.S.
Lawrence J. White
Abstract
Lawrence J. White
Abstract
Antitrust policy and industrial policy are almost always in an uneasy condition of coexistence with each other.This is especially true for Europe, where a longer and stronger tradition of formal state intervention in the economy and of a distrust of markets has crystallized into various forms of "industrial policy", often expressed as the support and protection of "national champions". 1Antitrust --and especially antitrust with real enforcement --has a more recent existence in Europe.By contrast, in the United States, the tradition of antitrust extends back for over a century, and the faith in markets is stronger.It was no accident that the deregulation movement that reduced governmental regulation that had impeded competition in transportation, telecommunications, financial, and energy markets first began in the U.S. in the 1970s 2 and only subsequently spread to Europe.The U.S. has never embraced a formal "industrial policy," and the only time that such an embrace was seriously debated was in the late 1970s and the 1980s. 3This was a period when U.S. economic growth had slowed appreciably from the relatively rapid growth that had characterized the postwar 1946-1973 era, and there were widespread fears that a primary reliance on markets would 1 For a discussion of European industrial policy, see, for example, Blais (1986) andPelkmans (2006).
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Antitrust policy and industrial policy are almost always in an uneasy condition of coexistence with each other.This is especially true for Europe, where a longer and stronger tradition of formal state intervention in the economy and of a distrust of markets has crystallized into various forms of "industrial policy", often expressed as the support and protection of "national champions". 1Antitrust --and especially antitrust with real enforcement --has a more recent existence in Europe.By contrast, in the United States, the tradition of antitrust extends back for over a century, and the faith in markets is stronger.It was no accident that the deregulation movement that reduced governmental regulation that had impeded competition in transportation, telecommunications, financial, and energy markets first began in the U.S. in the 1970s 2 and only subsequently spread to Europe.The U.S. has never embraced a formal "industrial policy," and the only time that such an embrace was seriously debated was in the late 1970s and the 1980s. 3This was a period when U.S. economic growth had slowed appreciably from the relatively rapid growth that had characterized the postwar 1946-1973 era, and there were widespread fears that a primary reliance on markets would 1 For a discussion of European industrial policy, see, for example, Blais (1986) andPelkmans (2006).
Key concepts: Industrial policy, Law and economics, Political science, Business, Economics, International trade