1993Unpublished venueRequires access

DRIVING FUTURE VEHICLES. CHAPTER 22: HOW CAN WE PREVENT OVERLOAD OF THE DRIVER?

Willem B. Verwey

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This chapter describes the Generic Intelligent Driver Support (GIDS) project on driver-car interfaces that adapt to the workload of car drivers. 'Workload' is here defined in terms of the load on a driver's perceptual, cognitive and motor resources. An adaptive interface must ensure that these resources are not overloaded. Workload can be reduced by: (1) postponing or cancelling messages; (2) changing the modality, format and content of messages; (3) allocating tasks to a driver when workload is low, but to an automatic system when it is high. Before a driver-car interface can adapt to driver workload, a system should know when to intervene, by having an indication of that workload, and be able to estimate loads on various human processing resources. The author conducted a preliminary study, which determined the levels of visual and cognitive load as a function of the road situation, driving experience and traffic density. Twenty-four drivers drove an instrumented car along a specific route in The Netherlands, while performing one of three secondary tasks. The route had six locations where performance was analysed. The results suggest that the visual resources of inexperienced drivers are slightly more loaded than those of experienced drivers. The author concludes that there is a need for an interface that integrates information from in-car devices, schedules them according to their priority, and adapts information presentation to current demands on the driver. For the covering abstract see IRRD 861934.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter describes the Generic Intelligent Driver Support (GIDS) project on driver-car interfaces that adapt to the workload of car drivers. 'Workload' is here defined in terms of the load on a driver's perceptual, cognitive and motor resources. An adaptive interface must ensure that these resources are not overloaded. Workload can be reduced by: (1) postponing or cancelling messages; (2) changing the modality, format and content of messages; (3) allocating tasks to a driver when workload is low, but to an automatic system when it is high. Before a driver-car interface can adapt to driver workload, a system should know when to intervene, by having an indication of that workload, and be able to estimate loads on various human processing resources. The author conducted a preliminary study, which determined the levels of visual and cognitive load as a function of the road situation, driving experience and traffic density. Twenty-four drivers drove an instrumented car along a specific route in The Netherlands, while performing one of three secondary tasks. The route had six locations where performance was analysed. The results suggest that the visual resources of inexperienced drivers are slightly more loaded than those of experienced drivers. The author concludes that there is a need for an interface that integrates information from in-car devices, schedules them according to their priority, and adapts information presentation to current demands on the driver. For the covering abstract see IRRD 861934.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter describes the Generic Intelligent Driver Support (GIDS) project on driver-car interfaces that adapt to the workload of car drivers. 'Workload' is here defined in terms of the load on a driver's perceptual, cognitive and motor resources. An adaptive interface must ensure that these resources are not overloaded. Workload can be reduced by: (1) postponing or cancelling messages; (2) changing the modality, format and content of messages; (3) allocating tasks to a driver when workload is low, but to an automatic system when it is high. Before a driver-car interface can adapt to driver workload, a system should know when to intervene, by having an indication of that workload, and be able to estimate loads on various human processing resources. The author conducted a preliminary study, which determined the levels of visual and cognitive load as a function of the road situation, driving experience and traffic density. Twenty-four drivers drove an instrumented car along a specific route in The Netherlands, while performing one of three secondary tasks. The route had six locations where performance was analysed. The results suggest that the visual resources of inexperienced drivers are slightly more loaded than those of experienced drivers. The author concludes that there is a need for an interface that integrates information from in-car devices, schedules them according to their priority, and adapts information presentation to current demands on the driver. For the covering abstract see IRRD 861934.

Key concepts: Workload, Interface (matter), Driving simulator, Computer science, Function (biology), Cognitive load, Cognition, Perception

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DRIVING FUTURE VEHICLES. CHAPTER 22: HOW CAN WE PREVENT OVERLOAD OF THE DRIVER? — Research Paper | ScholarLens