1959•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

THE PUBLIC COMPANY

Charlotte J. Erickson

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A Prime Minister who had once been managing director of a public company in the steel industry said in 1928: ‘Since the days when private industry gave place to the joint stock company there have battened on the joint stock companies large numbers of men connected with the management, and directors, who are parasitical and nothing but parasitical.’ At the very time he was speaking—in the late 'twenties—changes were being made in some of the firms in this industry where joint stock companies were at last nearly universal, changes which by 1953 were to make the parasitical officer and even the officer who was not an executive in the industry an anachronism. Some of these changes must clearly be attributed to the particular difficulties which the steel industry faced during these years, and others perhaps to broader developments in society itself. It is the purpose of this chapter to focus attention upon the public company in the two industries, hosiery and steel, in an effort to discover in what respects the joint stock company structure itself has been responsible for recent developments in management recruitment. Since public companies are on the whole larger units, both of ownership and operation, than private companies and partnerships, this inquiry can be expected to throw some light on the influence of large-scale production, as well as the dispersion of ownership, on management recruitment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A Prime Minister who had once been managing director of a public company in the steel industry said in 1928: ‘Since the days when private industry gave place to the joint stock company there have battened on the joint stock companies large numbers of men connected with the management, and directors, who are parasitical and nothing but parasitical.’ At the very time he was speaking—in the late 'twenties—changes were being made in some of the firms in this industry where joint stock companies were at last nearly universal, changes which by 1953 were to make the parasitical officer and even the officer who was not an executive in the industry an anachronism. Some of these changes must clearly be attributed to the particular difficulties which the steel industry faced during these years, and others perhaps to broader developments in society itself. It is the purpose of this chapter to focus attention upon the public company in the two industries, hosiery and steel, in an effort to discover in what respects the joint stock company structure itself has been responsible for recent developments in management recruitment. Since public companies are on the whole larger units, both of ownership and operation, than private companies and partnerships, this inquiry can be expected to throw some light on the influence of large-scale production, as well as the dispersion of ownership, on management recruitment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A Prime Minister who had once been managing director of a public company in the steel industry said in 1928: ‘Since the days when private industry gave place to the joint stock company there have battened on the joint stock companies large numbers of men connected with the management, and directors, who are parasitical and nothing but parasitical.’ At the very time he was speaking—in the late 'twenties—changes were being made in some of the firms in this industry where joint stock companies were at last nearly universal, changes which by 1953 were to make the parasitical officer and even the officer who was not an executive in the industry an anachronism. Some of these changes must clearly be attributed to the particular difficulties which the steel industry faced during these years, and others perhaps to broader developments in society itself. It is the purpose of this chapter to focus attention upon the public company in the two industries, hosiery and steel, in an effort to discover in what respects the joint stock company structure itself has been responsible for recent developments in management recruitment. Since public companies are on the whole larger units, both of ownership and operation, than private companies and partnerships, this inquiry can be expected to throw some light on the influence of large-scale production, as well as the dispersion of ownership, on management recruitment.

Key concepts: Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE PUBLIC COMPANY — Research Paper | ScholarLens