1981•Public Util. Fortn.; (United States)Requires access

Market-ordering devices from a gas distributor's viewpoint

Joseph R. Tiano

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Natural gas distributors have a large stake in the potential upcoming modifications to the 1978 Natural Gas Policy Act. The market ordering proposals now under consideration in the US Congress could have calamitous consequences for the distribution segment of the gas industry. Accordingly, distributors must thoughtfully assess such proposals and make constructive suggestions to ease the transition to higher natural gas prices. A discussion of several market-ordering concepts - including (1) allowing market-kickout provisions for distributors in pipeline service agreements, (2) making pipelines common carrier and letting distributors negotiate directly with producers, and (3) making pipeline customers third-party beneficiaries of the pipelines' supply contracts with producers - concludes that proper pipeline rate design at the federal level offers the best hope for the continued health of the gas industry and represents its surest approach to avoiding legislatively mandated market-ordering.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Natural gas distributors have a large stake in the potential upcoming modifications to the 1978 Natural Gas Policy Act. The market ordering proposals now under consideration in the US Congress could have calamitous consequences for the distribution segment of the gas industry. Accordingly, distributors must thoughtfully assess such proposals and make constructive suggestions to ease the transition to higher natural gas prices. A discussion of several market-ordering concepts - including (1) allowing market-kickout provisions for distributors in pipeline service agreements, (2) making pipelines common carrier and letting distributors negotiate directly with producers, and (3) making pipeline customers third-party beneficiaries of the pipelines' supply contracts with producers - concludes that proper pipeline rate design at the federal level offers the best hope for the continued health of the gas industry and represents its surest approach to avoiding legislatively mandated market-ordering.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Natural gas distributors have a large stake in the potential upcoming modifications to the 1978 Natural Gas Policy Act. The market ordering proposals now under consideration in the US Congress could have calamitous consequences for the distribution segment of the gas industry. Accordingly, distributors must thoughtfully assess such proposals and make constructive suggestions to ease the transition to higher natural gas prices. A discussion of several market-ordering concepts - including (1) allowing market-kickout provisions for distributors in pipeline service agreements, (2) making pipelines common carrier and letting distributors negotiate directly with producers, and (3) making pipeline customers third-party beneficiaries of the pipelines' supply contracts with producers - concludes that proper pipeline rate design at the federal level offers the best hope for the continued health of the gas industry and represents its surest approach to avoiding legislatively mandated market-ordering.

Key concepts: Natural gas, Pipeline transport, Negotiation, Pipeline (software), Business, Constructive, Natural gas industry, Downstream (manufacturing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Market-ordering devices from a gas distributor's viewpoint — Research Paper | ScholarLens