2000Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

From Nation-Building to the Construction of Europe: the Lessons and Limitations of the French Example

Brian Michael Jenkins

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

One of the problems associated with attempts to promote a popular sense of European identity is that there are no obvious historical models to serve as a guide. The most inviting analogy is with the process of nation-building in Europe itself in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but this raises a number of problems. Given what one author has called ‘the novelty of our historical circumstances’ (Gray, 1996, p. 19), the drawing of parallels between such different periods is clearly a hazardous undertaking. Furthermore, the very success of the national idea has itself raised obstacles to the development of supranational identities. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the problems associated with attempts to promote a popular sense of European identity is that there are no obvious historical models to serve as a guide. The most inviting analogy is with the process of nation-building in Europe itself in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but this raises a number of problems. Given what one author has called ‘the novelty of our historical circumstances’ (Gray, 1996, p. 19), the drawing of parallels between such different periods is clearly a hazardous undertaking. Furthermore, the very success of the national idea has itself raised obstacles to the development of supranational identities. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the problems associated with attempts to promote a popular sense of European identity is that there are no obvious historical models to serve as a guide. The most inviting analogy is with the process of nation-building in Europe itself in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, but this raises a number of problems. Given what one author has called ‘the novelty of our historical circumstances’ (Gray, 1996, p. 19), the drawing of parallels between such different periods is clearly a hazardous undertaking. Furthermore, the very success of the national idea has itself raised obstacles to the development of supranational identities. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Parallels, Novelty, Analogy, Gray (unit), Political science, History, Sociology, Aesthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From Nation-Building to the Construction of Europe: the Lessons and Limitations of the French Example — Research Paper | ScholarLens